head to head · open source
pixijs vs echotrace
pixijs has 48,178 GitHub stars, 5,071 forks, 344 open issues and last shipped yesterday. echotrace has 3,814 stars, 683 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. pixijs leads on adoption by 1,163% (48,178 vs 3,814 stars). pixijs is written in TypeScript under MIT; echotrace is written in various languages under MIT. pixijs has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, echotrace 18%. pixijs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (data-visualization), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| pixijs | echotrace | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 48K | ★ 3.8K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | — |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-03-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 683 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick pixijs if
- You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick echotrace if
- You want the echotrace feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- You evaluated both and echotrace fits your workflow better
About pixijs
PixiJS is an open source 2D rendering library for the web, described in its README as the HTML5 Creation Engine. It ships WebGL and WebGPU renderers and is written in TypeScript, distributed under the MIT license from the pixijs/pixijs repository, which has been developed for fourteen years and holds roughly 48,000 stars across about 5,000 forks. The project lives in the JavaScript and TypeScript ecosystem: it is installed through npm and driven from browser code, with GLSL shaders, canvas, canvas2d, and rendering engine listed among its topics. Its homepage is pixijs.com, and the repository carries the Data and …
read the full pixijs overview →
About echotrace
EchoTrace EchoTrace 是一个 完全本地 的微信聊天记录导出、分析与年度报告生成工具。它可以解密你的微信聊天记录并保存在本地离线查看，也可以将其导出为HTML等与朋友分享，还可以根据你的聊天记录为你生成独一无二的分析报告❤️ [!TIP] 如果导出聊天记录后，想深入分析聊天内容可以试试 ChatLab [!TIP] Echotrace现已停止维护 如想继续使用可以看看 WeFlow 对应Echotrace中的实时功能 或 密语 对应Echotrace中的备份功能 快速开始 面向新手的使用教程见 此文档 EchoTrace 为何而来 我想知道，这些年来，时间都带我遇见了谁，又留下了些什么 从生成的报告里，看到自己和某个朋友不知不觉间竟聊了上万句话，看到深夜里和朋友的互相倾诉，看到几万句话背后默默的陪伴，看到时间是如何悄无声息地，将一些人带到你的生命里，又将另一些人轻轻推向远方 我们总是在向前走，却很少有机会回头看看 如果这份小小的报告，能让你想起某个很久没联系的朋友，能让你对当下的陪伴心存感激，或者能在某个平凡的午后，给你带来一丝微笑和暖意，那么，这一切就都有了意义 面向开发者 如果你想从源码构建或为项目贡献代码，请遵循以下步骤： 更多架构、文件职责、调试与 CLI 说明，请阅读 开发者指引。 关于实时模式的实现可阅读 模块调用文档 未来计划 我们正在努力让 EchoTrace 变得更好，未来计划实现以下功…
read the full echotrace overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Business Intelligence & Reporting projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Business Intelligence & Reporting field.
Frequently asked questions
Is pixijs or echotrace more popular?
pixijs has 48,178 GitHub stars and echotrace has 3,814. pixijs has the larger community by that measure.
Are pixijs and echotrace free?
Both are open source. pixijs is licensed under MIT and echotrace under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between pixijs and echotrace?
pixijs is written in TypeScript and echotrace in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, pixijs or echotrace?
Choose pixijs if you want the larger community (48,178 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose echotrace if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.