head to head · open source
pixijs vs allure2
pixijs has 48,618 GitHub stars, 5,135 forks, 344 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. allure2 has 5,579 stars, 781 forks, 87 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pixijs leads on adoption by 771% (48,618 vs 5,579 stars). pixijs is written in TypeScript under MIT; allure2 is written in HTML under Apache-2.0. pixijs has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, allure2 14%. allure2 was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| pixijs | allure2 | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 49K | ★ 5.6K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-10-30 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 781 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick pixijs if
- You weight community size — 49K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick allure2 if
- You want the allure2 feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and allure2 fits your workflow better
About pixijs
Guides Tutorials Examples API Docs Discord Bluesky 𝕏 PixiJS ⚡️ Next Generation, Fastest HTML5 Creation Engine for the Web 🚀 WebGL & WebGPU Renderers ⚡️ Unmatched Performance & Speed 🎨 Easy to use, yet powerful API 📦 Asset Loader ✋ Full Mouse & Multi touch Support ✍️ Flexible Text Rendering 📐 Versatile Primitive and SVG Drawing 🖼️ Dynamic Textures 🎭 Masking 🪄 Powerful Filters 🌈 Advanced Blend Modes PixiJS is the fastest, most lightweight 2D library available for the web, working across all devices and allowing you to create rich, interactive graphics and cross platform applications using WebGL and…
read the full pixijs overview →
About allure2
[license]: "Apache License 2.0" [site]: "Official Website" [docs]: "Documentation" [qametaio]: "Qameta Software" [blog]: "Qameta Software Blog" [Twitter]: "Qameta Software" [twitter team]: "Team" [build]: [build badge]: [maven]: "Maven Central" [maven badge]: [release]: "Latest release" [release badge]: [CONTRIBUTING.md]: .github/CONTRIBUTING.md [CODE OF CONDUCT.md]: CODE OF CONDUCT.md Allure Report [![build badge][]][build] [![release badge][]][release] [![maven badge][]][maven] Allure Report is a flexible multi language test report tool to show you a detailed representation of what has been tested and extract…
read the full allure2 overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Business Intelligence & Reporting projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Business Intelligence & Reporting field.
Frequently asked questions
Is pixijs or allure2 more popular?
pixijs has 48,618 GitHub stars and allure2 has 5,579. pixijs has the larger community by that measure.
Are pixijs and allure2 free?
Both are open source. pixijs is licensed under MIT and allure2 under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between pixijs and allure2?
pixijs is written in TypeScript and allure2 in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, pixijs or allure2?
Choose pixijs if you want the larger community (48,618 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose allure2 if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.