head to head · open source

PentestGPT vs inql

PentestGPT has 15,605 GitHub stars, 2,721 forks, 81 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. inql has 1,811 stars, 188 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped 18 days ago. PentestGPT leads on adoption by 762% (15,605 vs 1,811 stars). PentestGPT is written in Python under MIT; inql is written in Kotlin under Apache-2.0. PentestGPT has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, inql 10%. inql was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (penetration-testing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

PentestGPT ★ 16K inql ★ 1.8K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

PentestGPT inql
GitHub stars ★ 16K ★ 1.8K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python Kotlin
Last push 2026-07-14 2026-09-09
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 188
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick PentestGPT if

  • You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full PentestGPT profile →

pick inql if

  • You want the inql feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and inql fits your workflow better

full inql profile →

About PentestGPT

PentestGPT is an MIT licensed Python framework that uses large language models to run automated penetration tests and CTF challenges, aimed at penetration testers, security engineers and CTF players who want an agent to drive the tooling rather than working through it by hand.

read the full PentestGPT overview →

About inql

InQL is an open source Burp Suite extension for advanced GraphQL testing, built by Doyensec for penetration testers, bug bounty hunters, and security teams who need to analyse GraphQL endpoints from inside the Burp proxy they already use.

read the full inql overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

PentestGPT vs PayloadsAllTheThings PentestGPT vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills PentestGPT vs ProjectDiscovery PentestGPT vs pentagi PentestGPT vs crowdsec PentestGPT vs Osintgram PentestGPT vs thc-hydra PentestGPT vs vuls PentestGPT vs osv-scanner PentestGPT vs rengine PentestGPT vs reconftw PentestGPT vs cve

Frequently asked questions

Is PentestGPT or inql more popular?

PentestGPT has 15,605 GitHub stars and inql has 1,811. PentestGPT has the larger community by that measure.

Are PentestGPT and inql free?

Both are open source. PentestGPT is licensed under MIT and inql under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between PentestGPT and inql?

PentestGPT is written in Python and inql in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, PentestGPT or inql?

Choose PentestGPT if you want the larger community (15,605 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose inql if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.