head to head · open source
PentestGPT vs inql
PentestGPT has 16,382 GitHub stars, 2,870 forks, 81 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. inql has 1,814 stars, 190 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. PentestGPT leads on adoption by 803% (16,382 vs 1,814 stars). PentestGPT is written in Python under MIT; inql is written in Kotlin under Apache-2.0. PentestGPT has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, inql 10%. inql was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (penetration-testing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| PentestGPT | inql | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 16K | ★ 1.8K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Kotlin |
| Last push | 2026-07-14 | 2026-11-10 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 190 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick PentestGPT if
- You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick inql if
- You want the inql feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Kotlin
- You evaluated both and inql fits your workflow better
About PentestGPT
[![Contributors][contributors shield]][contributors url] [![Forks][forks shield]][forks url] [![Stargazers][stars shield]][stars url] [![Issues][issues shield]][issues url] [![MIT License][license shield]][license url] [![Discord][discord shield]][discord url] PentestGPT AI Powered Autonomous Penetration Testing Agent Published at USENIX Security 2024 Official Website: pentestgpt.com » Research Paper · Report Bug · Request Feature Demo Installation Watch on YouTube PentestGPT in Action Watch on YouTube What's New in v1.0 (Agentic Upgrade) Multi Stage Pipeline The agent works through staged phases (recon →…
read the full PentestGPT overview →
About inql
InQL v6.1.2 Burp Extension for Advanced GraphQL Testing :rocket: Introduction Welcome to InQL, an open source GraphQL testing tool. This tool provides features designed to enhance your GraphQL testing experience, making it more efficient and effective. We appreciate your trust in InQL. Happy testing! :star2: Key Features The InQL user interface is equipped with three primary components: the Scanner , the Batch Queries , and the Engine Fingerprinting tab :mag right: Scanner The Scanner is the core of InQL, where you can analyze a GraphQL endpoint or a local introspection schema file. It auto generates all…
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is PentestGPT or inql more popular?
PentestGPT has 16,382 GitHub stars and inql has 1,814. PentestGPT has the larger community by that measure.
Are PentestGPT and inql free?
Both are open source. PentestGPT is licensed under MIT and inql under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between PentestGPT and inql?
PentestGPT is written in Python and inql in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, PentestGPT or inql?
Choose PentestGPT if you want the larger community (16,382 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose inql if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.