head to head · open source
PentestGPT vs cameradar
PentestGPT has 16,422 GitHub stars, 2,877 forks, 81 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. cameradar has 5,337 stars, 658 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped yesterday. PentestGPT leads on adoption by 208% (16,422 vs 5,337 stars). PentestGPT is written in Python under MIT; cameradar is written in Go under MIT. PentestGPT has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, cameradar 12%. cameradar was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (penetration-testing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| PentestGPT | cameradar | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 16K | ★ 5.3K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-07-14 | 2026-11-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 658 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick PentestGPT if
- You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick cameradar if
- You want the cameradar feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and cameradar fits your workflow better
About PentestGPT
[![Contributors][contributors shield]][contributors url] [![Forks][forks shield]][forks url] [![Stargazers][stars shield]][stars url] [![Issues][issues shield]][issues url] [![MIT License][license shield]][license url] [![Discord][discord shield]][discord url] PentestGPT AI Powered Autonomous Penetration Testing Agent Published at USENIX Security 2024 Official Website: pentestgpt.com » Research Paper · Report Bug · Request Feature Demo Installation Watch on YouTube PentestGPT in Action Watch on YouTube What's New in v1.0 (Agentic Upgrade) Multi Stage Pipeline The agent works through staged phases (recon →…
read the full PentestGPT overview →
About cameradar
Cameradar RTSP stream access tool Cameradar scans RTSP endpoints on authorized targets, and uses dictionary attacks to bruteforce their credentials and routes. What Cameradar does Detects open RTSP hosts on accessible targets. Detects the device model that streams the RTSP feed. Attempts dictionary based discovery of stream routes (for example, /live.sdp ). Attempts dictionary based discovery of camera credentials. Produces a report of findings. Table of contents Quick start with Docker Install the binary Install on Android (Termux) Configuration Security and responsible use Output Check camera access Command…
read the full cameradar overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is PentestGPT or cameradar more popular?
PentestGPT has 16,422 GitHub stars and cameradar has 5,337. PentestGPT has the larger community by that measure.
Are PentestGPT and cameradar free?
Both are open source. PentestGPT is licensed under MIT and cameradar under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between PentestGPT and cameradar?
PentestGPT is written in Python and cameradar in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, PentestGPT or cameradar?
Choose PentestGPT if you want the larger community (16,422 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose cameradar if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.