head to head · open source
Pentest-Swarm-AI vs pojia-next
Pentest-Swarm-AI has 3,115 GitHub stars, 570 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pojia-next has 1,004 stars, 271 forks, 17 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Pentest-Swarm-AI leads on adoption by 210% (3,115 vs 1,004 stars). Pentest-Swarm-AI is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; pojia-next is written in Python under MIT. Pentest-Swarm-AI has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, pojia-next 27%. pojia-next was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Pentest-Swarm-AI | pojia-next | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 3.1K | ★ 1.0K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 570 | ⑂ 271 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Pentest-Swarm-AI if
- You weight community size — 3.1K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick pojia-next if
- You want the pojia-next feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and pojia-next fits your workflow better
About Pentest-Swarm-AI
The open source XBOW alternative — an autonomous API & web app pentester. Dozens of AI agents don't just scan — they exploit . They chain attacks (BOLA/IDOR, JWT forgery, mass assignment, SSRF, injection), build and score attack paths, and prove real vulnerabilities at machine speed. Built for pentesters · bug bounty hunters · red teamers · security researchers 📖 Documentation · Quick Start · vs. XBOW · Swarm vs. Multi Agent · How It Works · Roadmap Hack at machine speed. 📖 New here? Start with the documentation — quickstart, provider setup, CLI reference, and…
read the full Pentest-Swarm-AI overview →
About pojia-next
破甲一键通 一句话：把你电脑上那几个 AI 客户端「自己改不到的内置提示词」，换成你自己写的那份 —— 双击 exe、点一个按钮的事。 支持 DSH / WorkBuddy / ZCode / Codex / Cursor / Claude Code / Gemini CLI / Qwen Code / iFlow / Trae / CodeBuddy / OpenCode / Windsurf / Cline / Copilot CLI 十五个客户端，一个工具全管，口径完全一致。 图形界面（原生窗口）+ 单文件 exe ：不装 Python、不敲命令、不进浏览器； 仓库只发成品 exe（Release 附件），源码不再随仓库分发。 🚨 一句话警告：本项目 完全免费 第三方发布的「 WKBD rev1.0 / rev2.0 」（化名 popopo ）是基于本项目 换皮二次发布 ， 且把 MIT 强制保留的版权声明删空成 Copyright (c) 2026 。 如果你花钱买了它，请立即退款 —— 完整证据与自助验证方法见 反抄袭通告。 🧭 30 秒看懂：这是干什么的？ 你平时用的 AI 客户端（比如 WorkBuddy、DSH），每次对话时都会在背后塞一段 你自己改不到的"规矩" —— 用来告诉 AI 它是什么身份、该守什么、什么不做什么能做。 这个工具做的事很简单： 把那段规矩，换成你自己写的一份。…
read the full pojia-next overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Pentest-Swarm-AI or pojia-next more popular?
Pentest-Swarm-AI has 3,115 GitHub stars and pojia-next has 1,004. Pentest-Swarm-AI has the larger community by that measure.
Are Pentest-Swarm-AI and pojia-next free?
Both are open source. Pentest-Swarm-AI is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and pojia-next under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Pentest-Swarm-AI and pojia-next?
Pentest-Swarm-AI is written in Go and pojia-next in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Pentest-Swarm-AI or pojia-next?
Choose Pentest-Swarm-AI if you want the larger community (3,115 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose pojia-next if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.