head to head · open source
pentagi vs Pentest-Swarm-AI
pentagi has 33,056 GitHub stars, 5,165 forks, 71 open issues and last shipped 12 days ago. Pentest-Swarm-AI has 3,115 stars, 570 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pentagi leads on adoption by 961% (33,056 vs 3,115 stars). pentagi is written in Go under MIT; Pentest-Swarm-AI is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. pentagi has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, Pentest-Swarm-AI 18%. Pentest-Swarm-AI was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai-agents, offensive-security, penetration-testing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| pentagi | Pentest-Swarm-AI | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 3.1K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-10-22 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.2K | ⑂ 570 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick pentagi if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Pentest-Swarm-AI if
- You want the Pentest-Swarm-AI feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and Pentest-Swarm-AI fits your workflow better
About pentagi
PentAGI P enetration testing A rtificial G eneral I ntelligence Join the Community! Connect with security researchers, AI enthusiasts, and fellow ethical hackers. Get support, share insights, and stay updated with the latest PentAGI developments. ⠀ Table of Contents Overview Features Architecture Agent Supervision Quick Start Agent Docker Access Running Several Instances How to Use PentAGI After Login API Access LLM Provider Configuration Ollama OpenAI Anthropic Google AI (Gemini) AWS Bedrock DeepSeek GLM Kimi Qwen MiniMax Advanced Setup Langfuse Integration Monitoring and Observability Knowledge Graph…
read the full pentagi overview →
About Pentest-Swarm-AI
The open source XBOW alternative — an autonomous API & web app pentester. Dozens of AI agents don't just scan — they exploit . They chain attacks (BOLA/IDOR, JWT forgery, mass assignment, SSRF, injection), build and score attack paths, and prove real vulnerabilities at machine speed. Built for pentesters · bug bounty hunters · red teamers · security researchers 📖 Documentation · Quick Start · vs. XBOW · Swarm vs. Multi Agent · How It Works · Roadmap Hack at machine speed. 📖 New here? Start with the documentation — quickstart, provider setup, CLI reference, and…
read the full Pentest-Swarm-AI overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is pentagi or Pentest-Swarm-AI more popular?
pentagi has 33,056 GitHub stars and Pentest-Swarm-AI has 3,115. pentagi has the larger community by that measure.
Are pentagi and Pentest-Swarm-AI free?
Both are open source. pentagi is licensed under MIT and Pentest-Swarm-AI under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between pentagi and Pentest-Swarm-AI?
pentagi is written in Go and Pentest-Swarm-AI in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, pentagi or Pentest-Swarm-AI?
Choose pentagi if you want the larger community (33,056 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Pentest-Swarm-AI if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.