head to head · open source
pentagi vs pojia-next
pentagi has 33,056 GitHub stars, 5,165 forks, 71 open issues and last shipped 12 days ago. pojia-next has 1,004 stars, 271 forks, 17 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pentagi leads on adoption by 3,192% (33,056 vs 1,004 stars). pentagi is written in Go under MIT; pojia-next is written in Python under MIT. pentagi has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, pojia-next 27%. pojia-next was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| pentagi | pojia-next | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 1.0K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-22 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.2K | ⑂ 271 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick pentagi if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick pojia-next if
- You want the pojia-next feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and pojia-next fits your workflow better
About pentagi
PentAGI P enetration testing A rtificial G eneral I ntelligence Join the Community! Connect with security researchers, AI enthusiasts, and fellow ethical hackers. Get support, share insights, and stay updated with the latest PentAGI developments. ⠀ Table of Contents Overview Features Architecture Agent Supervision Quick Start Agent Docker Access Running Several Instances How to Use PentAGI After Login API Access LLM Provider Configuration Ollama OpenAI Anthropic Google AI (Gemini) AWS Bedrock DeepSeek GLM Kimi Qwen MiniMax Advanced Setup Langfuse Integration Monitoring and Observability Knowledge Graph…
read the full pentagi overview →
About pojia-next
破甲一键通 一句话：把你电脑上那几个 AI 客户端「自己改不到的内置提示词」，换成你自己写的那份 —— 双击 exe、点一个按钮的事。 支持 DSH / WorkBuddy / ZCode / Codex / Cursor / Claude Code / Gemini CLI / Qwen Code / iFlow / Trae / CodeBuddy / OpenCode / Windsurf / Cline / Copilot CLI 十五个客户端，一个工具全管，口径完全一致。 图形界面（原生窗口）+ 单文件 exe ：不装 Python、不敲命令、不进浏览器； 仓库只发成品 exe（Release 附件），源码不再随仓库分发。 🚨 一句话警告：本项目 完全免费 第三方发布的「 WKBD rev1.0 / rev2.0 」（化名 popopo ）是基于本项目 换皮二次发布 ， 且把 MIT 强制保留的版权声明删空成 Copyright (c) 2026 。 如果你花钱买了它，请立即退款 —— 完整证据与自助验证方法见 反抄袭通告。 🧭 30 秒看懂：这是干什么的？ 你平时用的 AI 客户端（比如 WorkBuddy、DSH），每次对话时都会在背后塞一段 你自己改不到的"规矩" —— 用来告诉 AI 它是什么身份、该守什么、什么不做什么能做。 这个工具做的事很简单： 把那段规矩，换成你自己写的一份。…
read the full pojia-next overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is pentagi or pojia-next more popular?
pentagi has 33,056 GitHub stars and pojia-next has 1,004. pentagi has the larger community by that measure.
Are pentagi and pojia-next free?
Both are open source. pentagi is licensed under MIT and pojia-next under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between pentagi and pojia-next?
pentagi is written in Go and pojia-next in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, pentagi or pojia-next?
Choose pentagi if you want the larger community (33,056 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose pojia-next if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.