head to head · open source

pentagi vs Infosec_Reference

pentagi has 34,122 GitHub stars, 5,374 forks, 71 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Infosec_Reference has 6,042 stars, 1,232 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 19 days ago. pentagi leads on adoption by 465% (34,122 vs 6,042 stars). pentagi is written in Go under MIT; Infosec_Reference is written in CSS under MIT. pentagi has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, Infosec_Reference 20%. pentagi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (penetration-testing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

pentagi ★ 34K Infosec_Reference ★ 6.0K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

pentagi Infosec_Reference
GitHub stars ★ 34K ★ 6.0K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go CSS
Last push 2026-11-13 2026-10-26
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick pentagi if

  • You weight community size — 34K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full pentagi profile →

pick Infosec_Reference if

  • You want the Infosec_Reference feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches CSS
  • You evaluated both and Infosec_Reference fits your workflow better

full Infosec_Reference profile →

About pentagi

PentAGI P enetration testing A rtificial G eneral I ntelligence Join the Community! Connect with security researchers, AI enthusiasts, and fellow ethical hackers. Get support, share insights, and stay updated with the latest PentAGI developments. ⠀ Table of Contents Overview Features Architecture Agent Supervision Quick Start Agent Docker Access Running Several Instances How to Use PentAGI After Login API Access LLM Provider Configuration Ollama OpenAI Anthropic Google AI (Gemini) AWS Bedrock DeepSeek GLM Kimi Qwen MiniMax Advanced Setup Langfuse Integration Monitoring and Observability Knowledge Graph…

read the full pentagi overview →

About Infosec_Reference

InfoSec Reference Any communicaitons occuring within the United States should be viewed as compromised and no privacy guaranteed unless E2EE was used and verified(Not new). (New: The US gov now has legal authority to compel recording or monitoring by any citizen within the United States, regardless of their proximity or interaction with the supposed crime being monitored. Among the other issues made possible/enabled through passage of the legislation) I have kept this project non political, but this is absolutely terrible. Full support by Biden and his administration as well shows that this is not some partisan…

read the full Infosec_Reference overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Related comparisons

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

Frequently asked questions

Is pentagi or Infosec_Reference more popular?

pentagi has 34,122 GitHub stars and Infosec_Reference has 6,042. pentagi has the larger community by that measure.

Are pentagi and Infosec_Reference free?

Both are open source. pentagi is licensed under MIT and Infosec_Reference under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between pentagi and Infosec_Reference?

pentagi is written in Go and Infosec_Reference in CSS. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, pentagi or Infosec_Reference?

Choose pentagi if you want the larger community (34,122 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Infosec_Reference if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.