head to head · open source
pentagi vs artifact-keeper
pentagi has 33,728 GitHub stars, 5,277 forks, 71 open issues and last shipped 19 days ago. artifact-keeper has 1,260 stars, 177 forks, 257 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pentagi leads on adoption by 2,577% (33,728 vs 1,260 stars). pentagi is written in Go under MIT; artifact-keeper is written in Rust under MIT. pentagi has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, artifact-keeper 14%. artifact-keeper was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (open-source), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| pentagi | artifact-keeper | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 34K | ★ 1.3K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-10-22 | 2026-11-09 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.3K | ⑂ 177 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick pentagi if
- You weight community size — 34K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick artifact-keeper if
- You want the artifact-keeper feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and artifact-keeper fits your workflow better
About pentagi
PentAGI P enetration testing A rtificial G eneral I ntelligence Join the Community! Connect with security researchers, AI enthusiasts, and fellow ethical hackers. Get support, share insights, and stay updated with the latest PentAGI developments. ⠀ Table of Contents Overview Features Architecture Agent Supervision Quick Start Agent Docker Access Running Several Instances How to Use PentAGI After Login API Access LLM Provider Configuration Ollama OpenAI Anthropic Google AI (Gemini) AWS Bedrock DeepSeek GLM Kimi Qwen MiniMax Advanced Setup Langfuse Integration Monitoring and Observability Knowledge Graph…
read the full pentagi overview →
About artifact-keeper
Artifact Keeper An enterprise grade, open source artifact registry supporting 45+ package formats . Built with Rust. Documentation Demo Website Highlights 45+ Package Formats Native protocol support for Maven, PyPI, NPM, Docker/OCI, Cargo, Go, Helm, and 38 more WASM Plugin System Extend with custom format handlers via WebAssembly (WIT based, Wasmtime runtime) Security Scanning Automated vulnerability detection with Trivy and Grype, policy engine, quarantine workflow Hardened Containers All images built on DISA STIG approved Red Hat UBI 9 base images, non root execution, no shell or package manager in runtime…
read the full artifact-keeper overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is pentagi or artifact-keeper more popular?
pentagi has 33,728 GitHub stars and artifact-keeper has 1,260. pentagi has the larger community by that measure.
Are pentagi and artifact-keeper free?
Both are open source. pentagi is licensed under MIT and artifact-keeper under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between pentagi and artifact-keeper?
pentagi is written in Go and artifact-keeper in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, pentagi or artifact-keeper?
Choose pentagi if you want the larger community (33,728 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose artifact-keeper if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.