head to head · open source

pentagi vs afrog

pentagi has 24,708 GitHub stars, 3,177 forks, 71 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. afrog has 4,417 stars, 484 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pentagi leads on adoption by 459% (24,708 vs 4,417 stars). pentagi is written in Go under MIT; afrog is written in HTML under MIT. pentagi has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, afrog 11%. afrog was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (penetration-testing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

pentagi ★ 25K afrog ★ 4.4K category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

pentagi afrog
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 4.4K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go HTML
Last push 2026-09-10 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 484
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick pentagi if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full pentagi profile →

pick afrog if

  • You want the afrog feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and afrog fits your workflow better

full afrog profile →

About pentagi

PentAGI is an MIT licensed, self hosted multi agent system written in Go that runs fully autonomous AI agents to perform complex penetration testing tasks inside an isolated Docker sandbox, built for information security professionals, researchers, and enthusiasts.

read the full pentagi overview →

About afrog

afrog is an MIT licensed vulnerability scanner built for bug bounty, penetration testing and red teaming, aimed at testers who need fast verification of web targets and network services with low false positives.

read the full afrog overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

puter vs projectdiscovery mattermost vs projectdiscovery keycloak vs projectdiscovery tailscale vs projectdiscovery puter vs tracecat mattermost vs tracecat keycloak vs tracecat tailscale vs tracecat supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

pentagi vs PayloadsAllTheThings pentagi vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills pentagi vs ProjectDiscovery pentagi vs vuls pentagi vs osv-scanner pentagi vs Nettacker pentagi vs GDA-android-reversing-Tool pentagi vs Tracecat pentagi vs airgorah pentagi vs tenzir

Frequently asked questions

Is pentagi or afrog more popular?

pentagi has 24,708 GitHub stars and afrog has 4,417. pentagi has the larger community by that measure.

Are pentagi and afrog free?

Both are open source. pentagi is licensed under MIT and afrog under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between pentagi and afrog?

pentagi is written in Go and afrog in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, pentagi or afrog?

Choose pentagi if you want the larger community (24,708 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose afrog if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.