head to head · open source

parse-server vs bigquery-utils

parse-server has 21,409 GitHub stars, 4,807 forks, 561 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. bigquery-utils has 1,312 stars, 337 forks, 64 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. parse-server leads on adoption by 1,532% (21,409 vs 1,312 stars). parse-server is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; bigquery-utils is written in Jupyter Notebook under Apache-2.0. parse-server has attracted 22% as many forks as stars, bigquery-utils 26%. parse-server was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

parse-server ★ 21K bigquery-utils ★ 1.3K category Data & Analytics

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

parse-server bigquery-utils
GitHub stars ★ 21K ★ 1.3K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Jupyter Notebook
Last push 2026-09-13 2026-07-03
Forks ⑂ 4.8K ⑂ 337
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick parse-server if

  • You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full parse-server profile →

pick bigquery-utils if

  • You want the bigquery-utils feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Jupyter Notebook
  • You evaluated both and bigquery-utils fits your workflow better

full bigquery-utils profile →

About parse-server

Parse Server is an open source backend, built for Node.js and the Express web application framework, that can be deployed to any infrastructure able to run Node.js and that serves applications written against the Parse Platform.

read the full parse-server overview →

About bigquery-utils

Useful scripts, UDFs, views, notebooks, dashboards, and other utilities for migrating to and operating a data warehouse in Google BigQuery, aimed at data engineers, analytics engineers, and migration teams working on Google Cloud Platform.

read the full bigquery-utils overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs

More Data Warehousing & Processing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.

parse-server vs ClickHouse parse-server vs seaweedfs parse-server vs rustfs parse-server vs Apache Pinot parse-server vs dlt parse-server vs hue parse-server vs arc

Frequently asked questions

Is parse-server or bigquery-utils more popular?

parse-server has 21,409 GitHub stars and bigquery-utils has 1,312. parse-server has the larger community by that measure.

Are parse-server and bigquery-utils free?

Both are open source. parse-server is licensed under Apache-2.0 and bigquery-utils under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between parse-server and bigquery-utils?

parse-server is written in JavaScript and bigquery-utils in Jupyter Notebook. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, parse-server or bigquery-utils?

Choose parse-server if you want the larger community (21,409 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose bigquery-utils if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.