head to head · open source

parcel vs sbt

parcel has 44,025 GitHub stars, 2,284 forks, 606 open issues and last shipped 12 days ago. sbt has 4,952 stars, 1,046 forks, 498 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. parcel leads on adoption by 789% (44,025 vs 4,952 stars). parcel is written in JavaScript under MIT; sbt is written in Scala under Apache-2.0. parcel has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, sbt 21%. sbt was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (build-tool), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

parcel ★ 44K sbt ★ 5.0K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

parcel sbt
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 5.0K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Scala
Last push 2026-09-06 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 2.3K ⑂ 1.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick parcel if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full parcel profile →

pick sbt if

  • You want the sbt feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Scala
  • You evaluated both and sbt fits your workflow better

full sbt profile →

About parcel

Parcel is a zero configuration build tool for the web, distributed as the parcel package on npm and licensed under MIT. It lives in the JavaScript ecosystem and is written primarily in JavaScript, with its JavaScript compiler implemented in Rust for native performance. The project has been developed for roughly nine years, carries more than 44,000 stars and over 2,200 forks on GitHub, and its documentation is hosted at parceljs.org.

read the full parcel overview →

About sbt

sbt is an interactive build tool for Scala, Java, and more. It lives in the Scala ecosystem and is maintained under the Apache 2.0 license at scala sbt.org. The sbt/sbt repository hosts the build tool modules, while related code is split across sbt/io and sbt/zinc. It is categorized as Developer Tools / Build & Deployment.

read the full sbt overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs parcel vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite webpack vs appwrite vite vs harness vite vs dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

parcel vs vite parcel vs webpack parcel vs Appwrite parcel vs Harness parcel vs Dokku parcel vs turborepo parcel vs nx parcel vs NocoBase parcel vs gradle parcel vs rspack parcel vs devbox parcel vs xmake

Frequently asked questions

Is parcel or sbt more popular?

parcel has 44,025 GitHub stars and sbt has 4,952. parcel has the larger community by that measure.

Are parcel and sbt free?

Both are open source. parcel is licensed under MIT and sbt under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between parcel and sbt?

parcel is written in JavaScript and sbt in Scala. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, parcel or sbt?

Choose parcel if you want the larger community (44,025 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose sbt if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.