head to head · open source

parcel vs erlang.mk

parcel has 44,025 GitHub stars, 2,284 forks, 606 open issues and last shipped 12 days ago. erlang.mk has 587 stars, 237 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. parcel leads on adoption by 7,400% (44,025 vs 587 stars). parcel is written in JavaScript under MIT; erlang.mk is written in Makefile under ISC. parcel has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, erlang.mk 40%. erlang.mk was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (build-tool), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

parcel ★ 44K erlang.mk ★ 587 category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

parcel erlang.mk
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 587
License MIT ISC
Written in JavaScript Makefile
Last push 2026-09-06 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 2.3K ⑂ 237
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick parcel if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full parcel profile →

pick erlang.mk if

  • You want the erlang.mk feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the ISC license terms
  • Your stack matches Makefile
  • You evaluated both and erlang.mk fits your workflow better

full erlang.mk profile →

About parcel

Parcel is a zero configuration build tool for the web, distributed as the parcel package on npm and licensed under MIT. It lives in the JavaScript ecosystem and is written primarily in JavaScript, with its JavaScript compiler implemented in Rust for native performance. The project has been developed for roughly nine years, carries more than 44,000 stars and over 2,200 forks on GitHub, and its documentation is hosted at parceljs.org.

read the full parcel overview →

About erlang.mk

= Erlang.mk A build tool for Erlang that just works. guide] Embrace the power and simplicity of Makefiles. [source,make] PROJECT = webchat DEPS = cowboy dep cowboy commit = 2.8.0 include erlang.mk started] Tested and supported on FreeBSD, OSX] and Get help! server].

read the full erlang.mk overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs parcel vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite webpack vs appwrite vite vs harness vite vs dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

parcel vs vite parcel vs webpack parcel vs Appwrite parcel vs Harness parcel vs Dokku parcel vs turborepo parcel vs nx parcel vs NocoBase parcel vs gradle parcel vs rspack parcel vs devbox parcel vs xmake

Frequently asked questions

Is parcel or erlang.mk more popular?

parcel has 44,025 GitHub stars and erlang.mk has 587. parcel has the larger community by that measure.

Are parcel and erlang.mk free?

Both are open source. parcel is licensed under MIT and erlang.mk under ISC. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between parcel and erlang.mk?

parcel is written in JavaScript and erlang.mk in Makefile. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, parcel or erlang.mk?

Choose parcel if you want the larger community (44,025 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose erlang.mk if its feature set, stack or ISC licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.