head to head · open source
Osintgram vs malicious-pdf
Osintgram has 14,749 GitHub stars, 3,146 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. malicious-pdf has 4,449 stars, 588 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Osintgram leads on adoption by 232% (14,749 vs 4,449 stars). Osintgram is written in Python under GPL-3.0; malicious-pdf is written in Python under BSD-2-Clause. Osintgram has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, malicious-pdf 13%. Osintgram was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (penetration-testing, python), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Osintgram | malicious-pdf | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 15K | ★ 4.4K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-28 | 2026-08-27 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.1K | ⑂ 588 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Osintgram if
- You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick malicious-pdf if
- You want the malicious-pdf feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and malicious-pdf fits your workflow better
About Osintgram
Osintgram is a GPL 3.0 licensed OSINT tool for Instagram, written in Python 3.10+, that gives security researchers, penetration testers and investigators an interactive interface for profiling any public Instagram account from its nickname alone.
read the full Osintgram overview →
About malicious-pdf
malicious pdf is a Python generator of 67 malicious PDF test files for penetration testers, bug bounty hunters, and red teams who need to probe how PDF viewers, converters, and web applications handle hostile document content.
read the full malicious-pdf overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Osintgram or malicious-pdf more popular?
Osintgram has 14,749 GitHub stars and malicious-pdf has 4,449. Osintgram has the larger community by that measure.
Are Osintgram and malicious-pdf free?
Both are open source. Osintgram is licensed under GPL-3.0 and malicious-pdf under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Osintgram and malicious-pdf?
Osintgram is written in Python and malicious-pdf in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Osintgram or malicious-pdf?
Choose Osintgram if you want the larger community (14,749 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose malicious-pdf if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.