head to head · open source
Osintgram vs artex-global
Osintgram has 15,118 GitHub stars, 3,212 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. artex-global has 1,734 stars, 2,016 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Osintgram leads on adoption by 772% (15,118 vs 1,734 stars). Osintgram is written in Python under GPL-3.0; artex-global is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. Osintgram has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, artex-global 116%. Osintgram was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (penetration-testing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Osintgram | artex-global | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 15K | ★ 1.7K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 2.0K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Osintgram if
- You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick artex-global if
- You want the artex-global feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and artex-global fits your workflow better
About Osintgram
Osintgram 🔎📸 Point it at an Instagram account and find out who's behind it. Osintgram collects, cross references and lays out everything a public profile gives away — followers, captions, hashtags, geotagged locations, posting habits, public contact details — in a web interface you run on your own machine. Ask in plain language and a local AI model figures out which lookups to run. Or don't: pick the commands yourself and skip the model entirely. Why you might like it It answers questions, not just commands. "How many followers do they have and which hashtags do they use most?" runs three lookups and comes…
read the full Osintgram overview →
About artex-global
ARTEX — Global Edition An autonomous penetration testing system driven by LLM multi agents (Go backend + Next.js frontend) The UI and generated output default to English, and can be switched to Korean, Chinese, Spanish or Japanese in Settings (System → Settings → Display language). Changing the language also changes the language of agent generated reports, summaries and chat replies. English · 한국어 · 中文 · Español · 日本語 🚨 Security & misuse warning — read this first This repository is published for use only within authorized environments, and only to build defensive and detection capabilities. ARTEX is an…
read the full artex-global overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Osintgram or artex-global more popular?
Osintgram has 15,118 GitHub stars and artex-global has 1,734. Osintgram has the larger community by that measure.
Are Osintgram and artex-global free?
Both are open source. Osintgram is licensed under GPL-3.0 and artex-global under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Osintgram and artex-global?
Osintgram is written in Python and artex-global in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Osintgram or artex-global?
Choose Osintgram if you want the larger community (15,118 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose artex-global if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.