head to head · open source
organize vs paperless-mobile
organize has 3,194 GitHub stars, 201 forks, 77 open issues and last shipped yesterday. paperless-mobile has 1,504 stars, 111 forks, 135 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. organize leads on adoption by 112% (3,194 vs 1,504 stars). organize is written in Python under MIT; paperless-mobile is written in Dart under GPL-3.0. organize has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, paperless-mobile 7%. organize was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| organize | paperless-mobile | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 3.2K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Dart |
| Last push | 2026-11-12 | 2026-11-08 |
| Forks | ⑂ 201 | ⑂ 111 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick organize if
- You weight community size — 3.2K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick paperless-mobile if
- You want the paperless-mobile feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Dart
- You evaluated both and paperless-mobile fits your workflow better
About organize
organize The file management automation tool Full documentation at Read the docs v3 is now available The new version should be much faster and fix a lot of bugs. It also comes with a some new actions, filters and options. If you encounter any other bugs or problems during the migration, please reach out! See the changelog Migration guide About Your desktop is a mess? You cannot find anything in your downloads and documents? Sorting and renaming all these files by hand is too tedious? Time to automate it once and benefit from it forever. organize is a command line, open source alternative to apps like Hazel…
read the full organize overview →
About paperless-mobile
[![Contributors][contributors shield]][contributors url] [![Forks][forks shield]][forks url] [![Stargazers][stars shield]][stars url] [![Issues][issues shield]][issues url] [![MIT License][license shield]][license url] Paperless Mobile An (almost) fully fledged mobile paperless client. Report Bug · Request Feature About The Project Paperless Mobile brings paperless ngx to your smartphone without any compromises. While you can use paperless ngx from a mobile browser, managing your documents this way is often a tedious and slow process. The app integrates a custom scanner, biometric authentication and many more…
read the full paperless-mobile overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Document Management & E-Signatures projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Document Management & E-Signatures field.
Frequently asked questions
Is organize or paperless-mobile more popular?
organize has 3,194 GitHub stars and paperless-mobile has 1,504. organize has the larger community by that measure.
Are organize and paperless-mobile free?
Both are open source. organize is licensed under MIT and paperless-mobile under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between organize and paperless-mobile?
organize is written in Python and paperless-mobile in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, organize or paperless-mobile?
Choose organize if you want the larger community (3,194 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose paperless-mobile if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.