head to head · open source
ophel vs ctxport
ophel has 986 GitHub stars, 60 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. ctxport has 649 stars, 136 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. ophel leads on adoption by 52% (986 vs 649 stars). ophel is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0; ctxport is written in TypeScript under MIT. ophel has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, ctxport 21%. ophel was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 5 topic tags (ai-chat, browser-extension, chatgpt, chrome-extension), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ophel | ctxport | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 986 | ★ 649 |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-12 | 2026-03-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 60 | ⑂ 136 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ophel if
- You weight community size — 986 stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ctxport if
- You want the ctxport feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and ctxport fits your workflow better
About ophel
Ophel Atlas 🚀 Turn AI chats into documents you can read, navigate, and reuse Language: English 简体中文 ✨ Turn Conversations into Knowledge, Not Just History ✨ No more getting lost in endless scroll. Clarify context with real time Outlines, Build your system with Chat Folders, Refine experience with the Prompt Library, Let sparkling thoughts flow freely in order. 👇 Demo: From "Infinite Scroll" to "Navigable AI Documents" Making AI chat a truly organizeable workflow for the first time No matter which of these platforms you use, Ophel lets you organize conversations into reusable workflows with a consistent, unified…
read the full ophel overview →
About ctxport
CtxPort One click. Structured Markdown. Any AI conversation. Your AI conversations deserve a better clipboard. 简体中文 English Supported Platforms Get Started · Features · Documentation The Problem You just spent 45 minutes in a deep conversation with ChatGPT. You found the perfect architecture for your project. Now you need to share it with Claude for implementation. What do you do? Ctrl+A, Ctrl+C? You get a mess of HTML artifacts, broken formatting, and missing code blocks. Copy each message manually? Life is too short. Screenshot it? Text in images is where knowledge goes to die. AI conversations are the new…
read the full ctxport overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ophel or ctxport more popular?
ophel has 986 GitHub stars and ctxport has 649. ophel has the larger community by that measure.
Are ophel and ctxport free?
Both are open source. ophel is licensed under GPL-3.0 and ctxport under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between ophel and ctxport?
ophel is written in TypeScript and ctxport in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ophel or ctxport?
Choose ophel if you want the larger community (986 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose ctxport if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.