head to head · open source

OpenViking vs InternalSteamWebAPI

OpenViking has 40,373 GitHub stars, 3,244 forks, 999 open issues and last shipped today. InternalSteamWebAPI has 654 stars, 27 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. OpenViking leads on adoption by 6,073% (40,373 vs 654 stars). OpenViking is written in Python under AGPL-3.0; InternalSteamWebAPI is written in HTML under MIT. OpenViking has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, InternalSteamWebAPI 4%. OpenViking was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenViking ★ 40K InternalSteamWebAPI ★ 654 category Content & Publishing

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenViking InternalSteamWebAPI
GitHub stars ★ 40K ★ 654
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Python HTML
Last push 2026-10-20 2026-10-16
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 27
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenViking if

  • You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenViking profile →

pick InternalSteamWebAPI if

  • You want the InternalSteamWebAPI feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and InternalSteamWebAPI fits your workflow better

full InternalSteamWebAPI profile →

About OpenViking

The Context Database for AI Agents English / 中文 / 日本語 Website · Live Demo · GitHub · Issues · Docs · Blog Lark · WeChat · Discord · X What is OpenViking OpenViking is an open source context database for AI agents — one filesystem for everything an agent knows: knowledge, memory, and skills. Most agent memory is a black box: text goes in, embeddings come out, and nobody can see what was actually stored. OpenViking organizes context as a virtual filesystem under viking:// instead. Agents navigate it like files — ls , tree , read , write , grep — and you can open any directory to inspect and edit what your agent…

read the full OpenViking overview →

About InternalSteamWebAPI

📄 Internal Steam Web API Documentation Documenting the unofficial and internal Steam Web API ACCESS HERE Official API This wiki is not intended to list or document any "official" API that typically use an API key. If you are interested in that, I recommend this lovely Steam Web API Documentation by @xPaw. Contribution WE NEED YOUR HELP! Because of the nature of this kind of API, we desparately seek contributions to the wiki to keep the documentation up to date and complete! If this documentation was helpful to you in any way, please consider taking a few minutes to add a new wiki entry or update an existing one…

read the full InternalSteamWebAPI overview →

More in Content & Publishing

Related comparisons

More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenViking or InternalSteamWebAPI more popular?

OpenViking has 40,373 GitHub stars and InternalSteamWebAPI has 654. OpenViking has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenViking and InternalSteamWebAPI free?

Both are open source. OpenViking is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and InternalSteamWebAPI under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenViking and InternalSteamWebAPI?

OpenViking is written in Python and InternalSteamWebAPI in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenViking or InternalSteamWebAPI?

Choose OpenViking if you want the larger community (40,373 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose InternalSteamWebAPI if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.