head to head · open source

openhuman vs opencode.nvim

openhuman has 39,904 GitHub stars, 3,942 forks, 189 open issues and last shipped yesterday. opencode.nvim has 3,841 stars, 161 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped today. openhuman leads on adoption by 939% (39,904 vs 3,841 stars). openhuman is written in Rust under GPL-3.0; opencode.nvim is written in Lua under MIT. openhuman has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, opencode.nvim 4%. opencode.nvim was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, ai-assistant), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

openhuman ★ 40K opencode.nvim ★ 3.8K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

openhuman opencode.nvim
GitHub stars ★ 40K ★ 3.8K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Rust Lua
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 3.9K ⑂ 161
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick openhuman if

  • You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full openhuman profile →

pick opencode.nvim if

  • You want the opencode.nvim feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You evaluated both and opencode.nvim fits your workflow better

full opencode.nvim profile →

About openhuman

OpenHuman is an open source, GPL 3.0 licensed agent harness written in Rust and shipped as a Tauri desktop application, aimed at individuals who want a personal AI assistant whose memory, orchestration, and research tooling run local first on their own machine.

read the full openhuman overview →

About opencode.nvim

opencode.nvim is Neovim plugin, Lua code, MIT license. It connects Neovim to OpenCode, AI coding assistant. It lives in Neovim plugin ecosystem, under AI and machine learning, AI interaction and interfaces. It targets users wanting AI help without leaving terminal text editor. It bridges Neovim buffers, selections, cursor position, and prompt selection to OpenCode. It keeps user in known Neovim flow. It does not replace OpenCode interface. It uses OpenCode existing terminal user interface and API through standard Neovim interfaces. Topic tags include ai, ai agents, ai assistant, lua, neovim, neovim plugin, nvim, …

read the full opencode.nvim overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

openhuman vs OpenClaw openhuman vs Hermes Agent openhuman vs Open WebUI openhuman vs ComfyUI openhuman vs odysseus openhuman vs LobeChat openhuman vs AnythingLLM openhuman vs Cherry Studio openhuman vs nanobot openhuman vs Jan openhuman vs LibreChat openhuman vs chatbox

Frequently asked questions

Is openhuman or opencode.nvim more popular?

openhuman has 39,904 GitHub stars and opencode.nvim has 3,841. openhuman has the larger community by that measure.

Are openhuman and opencode.nvim free?

Both are open source. openhuman is licensed under GPL-3.0 and opencode.nvim under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between openhuman and opencode.nvim?

openhuman is written in Rust and opencode.nvim in Lua. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, openhuman or opencode.nvim?

Choose openhuman if you want the larger community (39,904 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose opencode.nvim if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.