head to head · open source

openhuman vs openbrowserclaw

openhuman has 39,904 GitHub stars, 3,942 forks, 189 open issues and last shipped yesterday. openbrowserclaw has 603 stars, 82 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. openhuman leads on adoption by 6,518% (39,904 vs 603 stars). openhuman is written in Rust under GPL-3.0; openbrowserclaw is written in TypeScript under MIT. openhuman has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, openbrowserclaw 14%. openhuman was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, ai-assistant), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

openhuman ★ 40K openbrowserclaw ★ 603 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

openhuman openbrowserclaw
GitHub stars ★ 40K ★ 603
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Rust TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-02-26
Forks ⑂ 3.9K ⑂ 82
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick openhuman if

  • You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full openhuman profile →

pick openbrowserclaw if

  • You want the openbrowserclaw feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and openbrowserclaw fits your workflow better

full openbrowserclaw profile →

About openhuman

OpenHuman is an open source, GPL 3.0 licensed agent harness written in Rust and shipped as a Tauri desktop application, aimed at individuals who want a personal AI assistant whose memory, orchestration, and research tooling run local first on their own machine.

read the full openhuman overview →

About openbrowserclaw

OpenBrowserClaw is an MIT licensed TypeScript personal AI assistant that runs entirely inside a browser tab, built for a single user who wants an AI agent without operating any server infrastructure.

read the full openbrowserclaw overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

openhuman vs OpenClaw openhuman vs Hermes Agent openhuman vs Open WebUI openhuman vs ComfyUI openhuman vs odysseus openhuman vs LobeChat openhuman vs AnythingLLM openhuman vs Cherry Studio openhuman vs nanobot openhuman vs Jan openhuman vs LibreChat openhuman vs chatbox

Frequently asked questions

Is openhuman or openbrowserclaw more popular?

openhuman has 39,904 GitHub stars and openbrowserclaw has 603. openhuman has the larger community by that measure.

Are openhuman and openbrowserclaw free?

Both are open source. openhuman is licensed under GPL-3.0 and openbrowserclaw under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between openhuman and openbrowserclaw?

openhuman is written in Rust and openbrowserclaw in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, openhuman or openbrowserclaw?

Choose openhuman if you want the larger community (39,904 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose openbrowserclaw if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.