head to head · open source
openhuman vs openbrowserclaw
openhuman has 42,530 GitHub stars, 4,210 forks, 189 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. openbrowserclaw has 604 stars, 82 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. openhuman leads on adoption by 6,941% (42,530 vs 604 stars). openhuman is written in Rust under GPL-3.0; openbrowserclaw is written in TypeScript under MIT. openhuman has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, openbrowserclaw 14%. openhuman was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, ai-assistant), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| openhuman | openbrowserclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 43K | ★ 604 |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Rust | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-02-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.2K | ⑂ 82 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick openhuman if
- You weight community size — 43K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick openbrowserclaw if
- You want the openbrowserclaw feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and openbrowserclaw fits your workflow better
About openhuman
OpenHuman OpenHuman is your personal AI super intelligence: a brain that remembers everything, a fantastic orchestrator, a deep researcher. Local first, simple, powerful. Discussions • Discord • Reddit • X/Twitter • Docs • Follow @senamakel (Creator) 🇺🇸 English 🇨🇳 简体中文 🇯🇵 日本語 🇰🇷 한국어 🇩🇪 Deutsch 🇵🇰 اردو Early Beta : Under active development. Expect rough edges. OpenHuman is not AGI. But it is a meaningful architectural step closer, with better memory, better orchestration, and better tooling. 🎉 Within one week of launch, OpenHuman became the number one trending repository on GitHub for nine days in a…
read the full openhuman overview →
About openbrowserclaw
OpenBrowserClaw Disclaimer: OpenBrowserClaw is a personal, open source project. It is not affiliated with any cryptocurrency, meme coin, token, or social media account. If you see coins, tokens, or social media profiles claiming association with this project, they are not legitimate and are not endorsed by the author(s). Stay safe and do your own research. Browser native personal AI assistant. Zero infrastructure — the browser is the server. Built as a browser only reimagination of NanoClaw. Same philosophy, small enough to understand, built for one user, but running entirely in a browser tab. Quick Start Open…
read the full openbrowserclaw overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is openhuman or openbrowserclaw more popular?
openhuman has 42,530 GitHub stars and openbrowserclaw has 604. openhuman has the larger community by that measure.
Are openhuman and openbrowserclaw free?
Both are open source. openhuman is licensed under GPL-3.0 and openbrowserclaw under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between openhuman and openbrowserclaw?
openhuman is written in Rust and openbrowserclaw in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, openhuman or openbrowserclaw?
Choose openhuman if you want the larger community (42,530 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose openbrowserclaw if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.