head to head · open source
openhuman vs octomind
openhuman has 42,570 GitHub stars, 4,211 forks, 189 open issues and last shipped yesterday. octomind has 593 stars, 74 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped yesterday. openhuman leads on adoption by 7,079% (42,570 vs 593 stars). openhuman is written in Rust under GPL-3.0; octomind is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. openhuman has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, octomind 12%. openhuman was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, ai-assistant), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| openhuman | octomind | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 43K | ★ 593 |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Rust | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-06 | 2026-11-06 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.2K | ⑂ 74 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick openhuman if
- You weight community size — 43K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick octomind if
- You want the octomind feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and octomind fits your workflow better
About openhuman
OpenHuman OpenHuman is your personal AI super intelligence: a brain that remembers everything, a fantastic orchestrator, a deep researcher. Local first, simple, powerful. Discussions • Discord • Reddit • X/Twitter • Docs • Follow @senamakel (Creator) 🇺🇸 English 🇨🇳 简体中文 🇯🇵 日本語 🇰🇷 한국어 🇩🇪 Deutsch 🇵🇰 اردو Early Beta : Under active development. Expect rough edges. OpenHuman is not AGI. But it is a meaningful architectural step closer, with better memory, better orchestration, and better tooling. 🎉 Within one week of launch, OpenHuman became the number one trending repository on GitHub for nine days in a…
read the full openhuman overview →
About octomind
Open source coding agent harness. One Rust binary, any model, every surface. Interactive, stdin, daemon, WebSocket, or ACP — one binary, one config. A supervising model plans and checks the work. Policy lives in TOML guardrails, not approval prompts. Website · Docs · Tap Registry · Benchmarks · Issues Octomind is an open source coding agent harness. It gives any LLM the tools to work in a repository — read and edit files, run shells, search code, delegate to sub agents — through MCP, and runs the result as an interactive CLI, a stdin pipe, a daemon, a WebSocket server, or an ACP agent in your editor. Most agents…
read the full octomind overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is openhuman or octomind more popular?
openhuman has 42,570 GitHub stars and octomind has 593. openhuman has the larger community by that measure.
Are openhuman and octomind free?
Both are open source. openhuman is licensed under GPL-3.0 and octomind under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between openhuman and octomind?
openhuman is written in Rust and octomind in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, openhuman or octomind?
Choose openhuman if you want the larger community (42,570 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose octomind if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.