head to head · open source

openhuman vs CosyVoice

openhuman has 39,838 GitHub stars, 3,928 forks, 189 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CosyVoice has 23,661 stars, 2,690 forks, 698 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. openhuman leads on adoption by 68% (39,838 vs 23,661 stars). openhuman is written in Rust under GPL-3.0; CosyVoice is written in Python under Apache-2.0. openhuman has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, CosyVoice 11%. openhuman was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

openhuman ★ 40K CosyVoice ★ 24K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

openhuman CosyVoice
GitHub stars ★ 40K ★ 24K
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Rust Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-05-25
Forks ⑂ 3.9K ⑂ 2.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick openhuman if

  • You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full openhuman profile →

pick CosyVoice if

  • You want the CosyVoice feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and CosyVoice fits your workflow better

full CosyVoice profile →

About openhuman

OpenHuman is an open source, GPL 3.0 licensed agent harness written in Rust and shipped as a Tauri desktop application, aimed at individuals who want a personal AI assistant whose memory, orchestration, and research tooling run local first on their own machine.

read the full openhuman overview →

About CosyVoice

CosyVoice is an Apache 2.0 Python text to speech system built on large language models that ships inference, training and deployment for multi lingual voice generation, aimed at teams who need self hosted zero shot voice cloning and streaming speech synthesis rather than a hosted API.

read the full CosyVoice overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 246K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail langchain vs ponytail dify vs graphify langchain vs graphify ponytail vs graphify dify vs claude-mem dify vs ragflow

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

openhuman vs OpenClaw openhuman vs Hermes Agent openhuman vs Open WebUI openhuman vs LobeChat openhuman vs AnythingLLM openhuman vs Cherry Studio openhuman vs nanobot openhuman vs Jan openhuman vs LibreChat openhuman vs chatbox openhuman vs AstrBot openhuman vs Langchain-Chatchat

Frequently asked questions

Is openhuman or CosyVoice more popular?

openhuman has 39,838 GitHub stars and CosyVoice has 23,661. openhuman has the larger community by that measure.

Are openhuman and CosyVoice free?

Both are open source. openhuman is licensed under GPL-3.0 and CosyVoice under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between openhuman and CosyVoice?

openhuman is written in Rust and CosyVoice in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, openhuman or CosyVoice?

Choose openhuman if you want the larger community (39,838 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose CosyVoice if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.