head to head · open source

openhuman vs clawe

openhuman has 39,904 GitHub stars, 3,942 forks, 189 open issues and last shipped yesterday. clawe has 752 stars, 82 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. openhuman leads on adoption by 5,206% (39,904 vs 752 stars). openhuman is written in Rust under GPL-3.0; clawe is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. openhuman has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, clawe 11%. openhuman was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, ai-assistant), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

openhuman ★ 40K clawe ★ 752 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

openhuman clawe
GitHub stars ★ 40K ★ 752
License GPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Rust TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-02-23
Forks ⑂ 3.9K ⑂ 82
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick openhuman if

  • You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full openhuman profile →

pick clawe if

  • You want the clawe feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and clawe fits your workflow better

full clawe profile →

About openhuman

OpenHuman is an open source, GPL 3.0 licensed agent harness written in Rust and shipped as a Tauri desktop application, aimed at individuals who want a personal AI assistant whose memory, orchestration, and research tooling run local first on their own machine.

read the full openhuman overview →

About clawe

Clawe is an AGPL 3.0 licensed, TypeScript multi agent coordination system that runs a squad of OpenClaw AI agents, each with its own identity, isolated workspace, and cron schedule, for developers and small teams that want coordinated AI workers rather than a single chat assistant.

read the full clawe overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

openhuman vs OpenClaw openhuman vs Hermes Agent openhuman vs Open WebUI openhuman vs ComfyUI openhuman vs odysseus openhuman vs LobeChat openhuman vs AnythingLLM openhuman vs Cherry Studio openhuman vs nanobot openhuman vs Jan openhuman vs LibreChat openhuman vs chatbox

Frequently asked questions

Is openhuman or clawe more popular?

openhuman has 39,904 GitHub stars and clawe has 752. openhuman has the larger community by that measure.

Are openhuman and clawe free?

Both are open source. openhuman is licensed under GPL-3.0 and clawe under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between openhuman and clawe?

openhuman is written in Rust and clawe in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, openhuman or clawe?

Choose openhuman if you want the larger community (39,904 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose clawe if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.