head to head · open source

openhuman vs claude-agents-library

openhuman has 42,530 GitHub stars, 4,210 forks, 189 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. claude-agents-library has 758 stars, 121 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. openhuman leads on adoption by 5,511% (42,530 vs 758 stars). openhuman is written in Rust under GPL-3.0; claude-agents-library is written in various languages under MIT. openhuman has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, claude-agents-library 16%. openhuman was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, ai-assistant), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

openhuman ★ 43K claude-agents-library ★ 758 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

openhuman claude-agents-library
GitHub stars ★ 43K ★ 758
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Rust —
Last push 2026-11-03 2026-04-14
Forks ⑂ 4.2K ⑂ 121
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick openhuman if

  • You weight community size — 43K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full openhuman profile →

pick claude-agents-library if

  • You want the claude-agents-library feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • You evaluated both and claude-agents-library fits your workflow better

full claude-agents-library profile →

About openhuman

OpenHuman OpenHuman is your personal AI super intelligence: a brain that remembers everything, a fantastic orchestrator, a deep researcher. Local first, simple, powerful. Discussions • Discord • Reddit • X/Twitter • Docs • Follow @senamakel (Creator) 🇺🇸 English 🇨🇳 简体中文 🇯🇵 日本語 🇰🇷 한국어 🇩🇪 Deutsch 🇵🇰 اردو Early Beta : Under active development. Expect rough edges. OpenHuman is not AGI. But it is a meaningful architectural step closer, with better memory, better orchestration, and better tooling. 🎉 Within one week of launch, OpenHuman became the number one trending repository on GitHub for nine days in a…

read the full openhuman overview →

About claude-agents-library

🤖 Claude Agents Library 34 Production Ready AI Agents for Claude — Copy, paste, and customize for any professional role Quick Start • Find an Agent • Categories • MCP Integration • Cost Optimization • www.aiagentskit.com 📖 Table of Contents What's New What is This? Why Use Agents? Quick Agent Finder Categories The Agents Quick Start MCP Integration Cost Optimization Customization Contributing Resources 🆕 What's New in v1.2 (January 16, 2026) [!NOTE] Latest update brings powerful new features for cost optimization and productivity! ✅ 7 MCP Integration Patterns — Copy paste workflows with code examples ✅ Model…

read the full claude-agents-library overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

Frequently asked questions

Is openhuman or claude-agents-library more popular?

openhuman has 42,530 GitHub stars and claude-agents-library has 758. openhuman has the larger community by that measure.

Are openhuman and claude-agents-library free?

Both are open source. openhuman is licensed under GPL-3.0 and claude-agents-library under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between openhuman and claude-agents-library?

openhuman is written in Rust and claude-agents-library in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, openhuman or claude-agents-library?

Choose openhuman if you want the larger community (42,530 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose claude-agents-library if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.