head to head · open source

OpenContracts vs sycamore

OpenContracts has 1,484 GitHub stars, 189 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped yesterday. sycamore has 608 stars, 72 forks, 57 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. OpenContracts leads on adoption by 144% (1,484 vs 608 stars). OpenContracts is written in Python under MIT; sycamore is written in Python under Apache-2.0. OpenContracts has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, sycamore 12%. OpenContracts was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai, etl, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenContracts ★ 1.5K sycamore ★ 608 category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenContracts sycamore
GitHub stars ★ 1.5K ★ 608
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-08-01
Forks ⑂ 189 ⑂ 72
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenContracts if

  • You weight community size — 1.5K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenContracts profile →

pick sycamore if

  • You want the sycamore feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and sycamore fits your workflow better

full sycamore profile →

About OpenContracts

OpenContracts is an MIT licensed, self hosted document intelligence platform that turns a repository of documents into a programmable citation graph, built for builders and hackers who need a document management system for the agentic world as much as a place to store files.

read the full OpenContracts overview →

About sycamore

Sycamore is an open source, AI powered document processing engine for ETL, retrieval augmented generation (RAG), LLM applications, and analytics on unstructured data, aimed at Python data engineers and AI developers who must turn reports, presentations, transcripts, and manuals into clean, chunked, searchable records.

read the full sycamore overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

airbyte vs cube airbyte vs shardingsphere cube vs shardingsphere airbyte vs debezium cube vs debezium shardingsphere vs debezium airbyte vs cocoindex cube vs cocoindex firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase

More Data Engineering & Integration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Engineering & Integration field.

OpenContracts vs Airbyte OpenContracts vs Cube OpenContracts vs shardingsphere OpenContracts vs debezium OpenContracts vs CocoIndex OpenContracts vs seatunnel OpenContracts vs steampipe OpenContracts vs realtime OpenContracts vs CloudQuery OpenContracts vs flink-cdc OpenContracts vs Lightdash OpenContracts vs fluvio

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenContracts or sycamore more popular?

OpenContracts has 1,484 GitHub stars and sycamore has 608. OpenContracts has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenContracts and sycamore free?

Both are open source. OpenContracts is licensed under MIT and sycamore under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenContracts and sycamore?

OpenContracts is written in Python and sycamore in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenContracts or sycamore?

Choose OpenContracts if you want the larger community (1,484 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose sycamore if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.