head to head · open source
Lightdash vs OpenContracts
Lightdash has 6,221 GitHub stars, 802 forks, 1,018 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenContracts has 1,534 stars, 199 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Lightdash leads on adoption by 306% (6,221 vs 1,534 stars). Lightdash is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; OpenContracts is written in Python under MIT. Lightdash has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, OpenContracts 13%. Lightdash was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Lightdash | OpenContracts | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 6.2K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 802 | ⑂ 199 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Lightdash if
- You weight community size — 6.2K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick OpenContracts if
- You want the OpenContracts feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and OpenContracts fits your workflow better
About Lightdash
Open source Agentic BI for modern data teams Build governed metrics, dashboards, AI agents, and data apps from your context layer. Ship analytics through Git, CI, MCP, and the Lightdash CLI. Why Lightdash Lightdash is the Agentic BI platform for teams that want analytics to move like software. Your context layer defines trusted metrics, joins, permissions, business logic, and caching once, then powers every way people consume data: dashboards, AI agents, data apps, embedded analytics, SDKs, and MCP. Data teams can build and maintain analytics with any AI agent, then use the terminal, pull requests, and CI to…
read the full Lightdash overview →
About OpenContracts
OpenContracts (Demo) Open source document intelligence you can build on. Point OpenContracts at a repository of documents and get a programmable citation graph — human annotation, structured extraction, AI agents, and a built in MCP server, all behind one API. Self hosted, MIT licensed, and built for teams working at scale. Same graph, three surfaces: a GraphQL + REST API for your apps, a Model Context Protocol server for your agents, and a React UI for your team. From documents to a citation graph — in about a minute Create a corpus, drop in your documents, and click Set up . That one click installs the…
read the full OpenContracts overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Engineering & Integration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Engineering & Integration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Lightdash or OpenContracts more popular?
Lightdash has 6,221 GitHub stars and OpenContracts has 1,534. Lightdash has the larger community by that measure.
Are Lightdash and OpenContracts free?
Both are open source. Lightdash has no licence declared in this registry, and OpenContracts is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Lightdash and OpenContracts?
Lightdash is written in TypeScript and OpenContracts in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Lightdash or OpenContracts?
Choose Lightdash if you want the larger community (6,221 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose OpenContracts if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.