head to head · open source
OpenClaw vs llm-workflow-engine
OpenClaw has 390,029 GitHub stars, 81,995 forks, 6,671 open issues and last shipped today. llm-workflow-engine has 3,715 stars, 467 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. OpenClaw leads on adoption by 10,399% (390,029 vs 3,715 stars). OpenClaw is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; llm-workflow-engine is written in Python under MIT. OpenClaw has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, llm-workflow-engine 13%. OpenClaw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| OpenClaw | llm-workflow-engine | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 390K | ★ 3.7K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-05 |
| Forks | ⑂ 82K | ⑂ 467 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick OpenClaw if
- You weight community size — 390K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick llm-workflow-engine if
- You want the llm-workflow-engine feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and llm-workflow-engine fits your workflow better
About OpenClaw
OpenClaw is an open source, self hosted AI assistant in the AI & Machine Learning / AI Interaction & Interfaces category that runs on hardware the user controls and meets them inside the messaging channels they already use, for individuals who want a personal assistant on a laptop and teams that want a shared deployment.
read the full OpenClaw overview →
About llm-workflow-engine
LLM Workflow Engine LLM Workflow Engine (LWE) is a Power CLI and Workflow manager for LLMs. Read the documentation WATCH INTRO VIDEO Welcome! What would you like to do? Learn about the project Install LWE Learn how to use it Read the documentation Learn more about configuration/features Troubleshoot common issues Upgrade LWE Using GPT4 Report a bug Get support What happend to the original ChatGPT Wrapper project? See CHATGPT WRAPPER.md ChatGPT Wrapper was an amazing tool for its time, thank you to its original creator mmabrouk for all your hard work, it lives on in a new form :) Highlights 🤖 LWE lets you use the…
read the full llm-workflow-engine overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenClaw or llm-workflow-engine more popular?
OpenClaw has 390,029 GitHub stars and llm-workflow-engine has 3,715. OpenClaw has the larger community by that measure.
Are OpenClaw and llm-workflow-engine free?
Both are open source. OpenClaw has no licence declared in this registry, and llm-workflow-engine is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between OpenClaw and llm-workflow-engine?
OpenClaw is written in TypeScript and llm-workflow-engine in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, OpenClaw or llm-workflow-engine?
Choose OpenClaw if you want the larger community (390,029 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose llm-workflow-engine if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.