head to head · open source
OpenClaw vs FLUJO
OpenClaw has 389,982 GitHub stars, 81,978 forks, 6,671 open issues and last shipped yesterday. FLUJO has 629 stars, 88 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. OpenClaw leads on adoption by 61,900% (389,982 vs 629 stars). OpenClaw is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; FLUJO is written in TypeScript under MIT. OpenClaw has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, FLUJO 14%. OpenClaw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| OpenClaw | FLUJO | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 390K | ★ 629 |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 82K | ⑂ 88 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick OpenClaw if
- You weight community size — 390K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick FLUJO if
- You want the FLUJO feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and FLUJO fits your workflow better
About OpenClaw
OpenClaw is an open source, self hosted AI assistant in the AI & Machine Learning / AI Interaction & Interfaces category that runs on hardware the user controls and meets them inside the messaging channels they already use, for individuals who want a personal assistant on a laptop and teams that want a shared deployment.
read the full OpenClaw overview →
About FLUJO
FLUJO is an open source, local first visual builder for multi agent AI workflows that lets you connect models and apps, build agents as step by step recipes or expert visual flows, inspect every run, and expose those same agents through OpenAI compatible and MCP endpoints, aimed at developers, automation builders, and technical teams that want their keys and data to stay under their own control.
read the full FLUJO overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenClaw or FLUJO more popular?
OpenClaw has 389,982 GitHub stars and FLUJO has 629. OpenClaw has the larger community by that measure.
Are OpenClaw and FLUJO free?
Both are open source. OpenClaw has no licence declared in this registry, and FLUJO is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between OpenClaw and FLUJO?
OpenClaw is written in TypeScript and FLUJO in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, OpenClaw or FLUJO?
Choose OpenClaw if you want the larger community (389,982 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose FLUJO if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.