head to head · open source

LibreChat vs open-spaces

LibreChat has 45,415 GitHub stars, 9,324 forks, 732 open issues and last shipped yesterday. open-spaces has 3,394 stars, 496 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LibreChat leads on adoption by 1,238% (45,415 vs 3,394 stars). LibreChat is written in TypeScript under MIT; open-spaces is written in JavaScript under MIT. LibreChat has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, open-spaces 15%. LibreChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LibreChat ★ 45K open-spaces ★ 3.4K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

LibreChat open-spaces
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 3.4K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-10-08 2026-10-08
Forks ⑂ 9.3K ⑂ 496
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LibreChat if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LibreChat profile →

pick open-spaces if

  • You want the open-spaces feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and open-spaces fits your workflow better

full open-spaces profile →

About LibreChat

LibreChat is an open source, self hostable chat interface designed as an enhanced ChatGPT clone. It unifies access to multiple AI models—including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, DeepSeek, Mistral, AWS Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, and others—within a single web application. Built in TypeScript, it supports real time streaming, multi model switching, and advanced agent workflows while providing features like message search, artifacts, code interpreter, and secure multi user authentication.

read the full LibreChat overview →

About open-spaces

OpenSpaces is a free, MIT licensed, self hostable AI workspace that brings shared Spaces, editable pages, conversations, and AI tools into one application, aimed at individuals and teams who want an open alternative to ChatGPT Spaces running on their own infrastructure.

read the full open-spaces overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 391K Hermes Agent ★ 252K Ollama ★ 182K ponytail ★ 158K Dify ★ 158K Open WebUI ★ 154K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

LibreChat vs OpenClaw LibreChat vs Hermes Agent LibreChat vs Open WebUI LibreChat vs ComfyUI LibreChat vs odysseus LibreChat vs LobeChat LibreChat vs AnythingLLM LibreChat vs Cherry Studio LibreChat vs nanobot LibreChat vs Jan LibreChat vs chatbox LibreChat vs openhuman

Frequently asked questions

Is LibreChat or open-spaces more popular?

LibreChat has 45,415 GitHub stars and open-spaces has 3,394. LibreChat has the larger community by that measure.

Are LibreChat and open-spaces free?

Both are open source. LibreChat is licensed under MIT and open-spaces under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between LibreChat and open-spaces?

LibreChat is written in TypeScript and open-spaces in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LibreChat or open-spaces?

Choose LibreChat if you want the larger community (45,415 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose open-spaces if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.