head to head · open source
open-knowledge vs llm-wiki-compiler
open-knowledge has 4,790 GitHub stars, 329 forks, 38 open issues and last shipped yesterday. llm-wiki-compiler has 2,236 stars, 238 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. open-knowledge leads on adoption by 114% (4,790 vs 2,236 stars). open-knowledge is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0; llm-wiki-compiler is written in TypeScript under MIT. open-knowledge has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, llm-wiki-compiler 11%. open-knowledge was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (agent-skills, knowledge-base, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| open-knowledge | llm-wiki-compiler | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 4.8K | ★ 2.2K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 329 | ⑂ 238 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick open-knowledge if
- You weight community size — 4.8K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick llm-wiki-compiler if
- You want the llm-wiki-compiler feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and llm-wiki-compiler fits your workflow better
About open-knowledge
OpenKnowledge is a beautiful markdown editor with integrations with Claude, Codex, and other harnesses. For knowledge bases, LLM wikis, specs, and notes. Private, local, and free. website • desktop app • web UI + cli • 𝕏 • discord Features Highlights: Full true WYSIWYG so that editing markdown files feels like editing a Google Doc or Notion page. Desktop app (macOS, Windows, Linux) and web UI with file navigator, search, tabs, graph wiki link viewer, and more. Integrated side by side AI editing with Claude, Codex, OpenCode, Pi and others . Can be used with any harness/agent via MCP/CLI. Out of the box MCP…
read the full open-knowledge overview →
About llm-wiki-compiler
llmwiki New in 1.3 — A fresh look for your wiki. Meet Scientific Clay, with soft surfaces and rounded typography, and Minimal, which follows your system’s light or dark setting. Switch instantly between four themes, including Nebula Light and Dark. Scientific Clay Minimal The same page in a demonstration wiki. Click either screenshot for a closer look. Recursive source folders, path exclusions, project specific compile instructions, and storage for larger embedding indexes. Configurable Lifecycle Profiles — introduced in 1.0. Build a domain specific wiki with typed records, relationships, lifecycle gates, and…
read the full llm-wiki-compiler overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.
Frequently asked questions
Is open-knowledge or llm-wiki-compiler more popular?
open-knowledge has 4,790 GitHub stars and llm-wiki-compiler has 2,236. open-knowledge has the larger community by that measure.
Are open-knowledge and llm-wiki-compiler free?
Both are open source. open-knowledge is licensed under GPL-3.0 and llm-wiki-compiler under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between open-knowledge and llm-wiki-compiler?
open-knowledge is written in TypeScript and llm-wiki-compiler in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, open-knowledge or llm-wiki-compiler?
Choose open-knowledge if you want the larger community (4,790 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose llm-wiki-compiler if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.