head to head · open source

opcode vs dillinger

opcode has 22,401 GitHub stars, 1,724 forks, 332 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. dillinger has 8,286 stars, 1,156 forks, 157 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. opcode leads on adoption by 170% (22,401 vs 8,286 stars). opcode is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; dillinger is written in TypeScript under MIT. opcode has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, dillinger 14%. opcode was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ide), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

opcode ★ 22K dillinger ★ 8.3K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

opcode dillinger
GitHub stars ★ 22K ★ 8.3K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-06-21
Forks ⑂ 1.7K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick opcode if

  • You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full opcode profile →

pick dillinger if

  • You want the dillinger feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and dillinger fits your workflow better

full dillinger profile →

About opcode

opcode is an open source desktop GUI application and toolkit for Claude Code that provides a visual command centre for projects, sessions, custom agents, Model Context Protocol servers, checkpoints, and API usage, aimed at developers who already work with Claude Code from the command line and want a graphical layer over it.

read the full opcode overview →

About dillinger

Dillinger is a free, MIT licensed, cloud native Markdown editor built on Next.js and the Monaco Editor, intended for developers, bloggers and writers who want focused writing in the browser with the option to sync finished documents to cloud storage they already use.

read the full dillinger overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 266K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 210K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More IDEs & Code Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the IDEs & Code Editors field.

opcode vs vscode opcode vs Neovim opcode vs Zed opcode vs code-server opcode vs helix opcode vs vscodium opcode vs NvChad opcode vs Kilo opcode vs CodeEdit opcode vs devpod opcode vs platformio-core opcode vs spyder

Frequently asked questions

Is opcode or dillinger more popular?

opcode has 22,401 GitHub stars and dillinger has 8,286. opcode has the larger community by that measure.

Are opcode and dillinger free?

Both are open source. opcode is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and dillinger under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between opcode and dillinger?

opcode is written in TypeScript and dillinger in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, opcode or dillinger?

Choose opcode if you want the larger community (22,401 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose dillinger if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.