head to head · open source

Ollama vs Laminar

Ollama has 181,161 GitHub stars, 17,917 forks, 3,957 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Laminar has 3,265 stars, 239 forks, 116 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Ollama leads on adoption by 5,449% (181,161 vs 3,265 stars). Ollama is written in Go under MIT; Laminar is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Ollama has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Laminar 7%. Ollama was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Ollama ★ 181K Laminar ★ 3.3K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Ollama Laminar
GitHub stars ★ 181K ★ 3.3K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 18K ⑂ 239
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Ollama if

  • You weight community size — 181K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Ollama profile →

pick Laminar if

  • You want the Laminar feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Laminar fits your workflow better

full Laminar profile →

About Ollama

Ollama is a Go based, MIT licensed runtime that downloads and runs open source large language models such as DeepSeek, Qwen, Gemma, GLM, MiniMax and gpt oss locally on a user's own machine, and it is aimed at developers and teams that want model inference without routing prompts through a hosted API.

read the full Ollama overview →

About Laminar

Laminar is an open source observability platform purpose built for AI agents, distributed under the Apache 2.0 license and written primarily in TypeScript. It was built by the team behind Y Combinator's S24 batch and lives in the AI and machine learning infrastructure ecosystem, with a topic list spanning agent observability, LLM evaluation, LLMOps and AIOps. The project ships as a tracing and evaluation stack rather than a general purpose APM tool, and its homepage at laminar.sh hosts both documentation and a managed offering.

read the full Laminar overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 246K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K ponytail ★ 141K

Related comparisons

ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse llama-cpp vs vllm openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail langchain vs ponytail dify vs graphify langchain vs graphify ponytail vs graphify dify vs claude-mem dify vs ragflow

More Machine Learning Infrastructure projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Machine Learning Infrastructure field.

Ollama vs llama.cpp Ollama vs vllm Ollama vs GPT4All Ollama vs llama_index Ollama vs LocalAI Ollama vs PageIndex Ollama vs Langfuse Ollama vs cognee Ollama vs taipy Ollama vs dagster Ollama vs zvec Ollama vs langchain4j

Frequently asked questions

Is Ollama or Laminar more popular?

Ollama has 181,161 GitHub stars and Laminar has 3,265. Ollama has the larger community by that measure.

Are Ollama and Laminar free?

Both are open source. Ollama is licensed under MIT and Laminar under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Ollama and Laminar?

Ollama is written in Go and Laminar in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Ollama or Laminar?

Choose Ollama if you want the larger community (181,161 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Laminar if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.