head to head · open source
octo-server vs xyne-spaces
octo-server has 1,108 GitHub stars, 174 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. xyne-spaces has 826 stars, 575 forks, 514 open issues and last shipped yesterday. octo-server leads on adoption by 34% (1,108 vs 826 stars). octo-server is written in Go under Apache-2.0; xyne-spaces is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. octo-server has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, xyne-spaces 70%. xyne-spaces was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, collaboration), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| octo-server | xyne-spaces | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 1.1K | ★ 826 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-06 | 2026-11-07 |
| Forks | ⑂ 174 | ⑂ 575 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick octo-server if
- You weight community size — 1.1K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick xyne-spaces if
- You want the xyne-spaces feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and xyne-spaces fits your workflow better
About octo-server
OCTO — the open workplace built for humans × AI agents. Let Lobsters (OpenClaw powered digital doubles) do the thinking and doing . You focus on taste . 🏠 OCTO Home · 🚀 Quickstart · 📦 Ecosystem · 🤝 Contributing 🌐 Read in : English · 简体中文 OCTO Server The Go backend at the centre of OCTO — REST + WebSocket APIs, Lobster agent orchestration, and the control plane for WuKongIM. octo server is the heart of the OCTO platform. It exposes REST + WebSocket APIs consumed by octo web and octo admin , orchestrates business logic and Lobster (AI agent) scheduling, and drives the WuKongIM IM core for real time messaging…
read the full octo-server overview →
About xyne-spaces
Xyne Spaces The org OS — your organization's context layer, with collaborative apps built around it. Real time, permission aware and built for agents. At the center: your org's context. Connectors bring in what your organization already knows — Slack, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365 and more — normalised into a store built for records and retrieval, and served back to your people and your agents through permission aware org context APIs, so every caller gets exactly the slice they're allowed to see. Around that core sit the org apps — Call · Claw · Agentic Search · Automations · Customer Support Desk · Chat ·…
read the full xyne-spaces overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Communication projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.
Frequently asked questions
Is octo-server or xyne-spaces more popular?
octo-server has 1,108 GitHub stars and xyne-spaces has 826. octo-server has the larger community by that measure.
Are octo-server and xyne-spaces free?
Both are open source. octo-server is licensed under Apache-2.0 and xyne-spaces under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between octo-server and xyne-spaces?
octo-server is written in Go and xyne-spaces in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, octo-server or xyne-spaces?
Choose octo-server if you want the larger community (1,108 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose xyne-spaces if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.