head to head · open source
nono vs NeuroSploit
nono has 4,609 GitHub stars, 317 forks, 201 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. NeuroSploit has 1,477 stars, 351 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. nono leads on adoption by 212% (4,609 vs 1,477 stars). nono is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; NeuroSploit is written in Rust under MIT. nono has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, NeuroSploit 24%. nono was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, ai-security), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| nono | NeuroSploit | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 4.6K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Rust | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 317 | ⑂ 351 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick nono if
- You weight community size — 4.6K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick NeuroSploit if
- You want the NeuroSploit feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and NeuroSploit fits your workflow better
About nono
Built by the team that brought you Sigstore The standard for secure software attestation, used by PyPI, npm, brew, and Maven Central [!NOTE] In the lead up to a 1.0 release, APIs are stabilizing. API changes may still occur where necessary, but will be kept to a minimum. [!IMPORTANT] Organization migration: The official nono registry namespace has moved from always further to nolabs ai . Update any references in your scripts, profiles, and CI. If you already have a pack installed under the old namespace, remove it first before pulling from the new one: The old namespace will be retired — migrate now. Run AI…
About NeuroSploit
🧠 NeuroSploit v4.4.0 Autonomous, multi model penetration testing harness — Rust, CLI first. by Joas A Santos & Red Team Leaders What is NeuroSploit? NeuroSploit is an autonomous penetration testing tool. You point it at a target; it does the security assessment on its own and hands you a report — recon, exploitation, chaining findings into real impact, and validation, with no human driving each step. The key idea: the harness is the pentester, not the model. Instead of asking one LLM to "hack this", a Rust engine runs the methodology — it picks the right specialist agents for what it finds, runs them in…
read the full NeuroSploit overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is nono or NeuroSploit more popular?
nono has 4,609 GitHub stars and NeuroSploit has 1,477. nono has the larger community by that measure.
Are nono and NeuroSploit free?
Both are open source. nono is licensed under Apache-2.0 and NeuroSploit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between nono and NeuroSploit?
nono is written in Rust and NeuroSploit in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, nono or NeuroSploit?
Choose nono if you want the larger community (4,609 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose NeuroSploit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.