head to head · open source

hexo vs nodepress

hexo has 41,779 GitHub stars, 42 forks, 75 open issues and last shipped 22 days ago. nodepress has 1,525 stars, 308 forks, 17 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. hexo leads on adoption by 2,640% (41,779 vs 1,525 stars). hexo is written in TypeScript under MIT; nodepress is written in TypeScript under MIT. hexo has attracted 0% as many forks as stars, nodepress 20%. hexo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

hexo ★ 42K nodepress ★ 1.5K category Content & Publishing

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

hexo nodepress
GitHub stars ★ 42K ★ 1.5K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-08-29 2026-06-19
Forks ⑂ 42 ⑂ 308
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick hexo if

  • You weight community size — 42K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full hexo profile →

pick nodepress if

  • You want the nodepress feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and nodepress fits your workflow better

full nodepress profile →

About hexo

Hexo is a static site generator for blogs, built on Node.js and distributed as the hexo package through npm. The project is written in TypeScript, licensed under MIT, and lives in the Node.js and JavaScript ecosystem alongside the broader set of static site generators tracked under the static site generator topic. It has been published for roughly 14 years, carries about 41,766 stars, and points users to a dedicated website and documentation set at hexo.io.

read the full hexo overview →

About nodepress

NodePress is a TypeScript based headless content management system API service for the surmon.me blog, built with NestJS. It provides a RESTful blog API service, while the frontend, administration, native application, and AI agent are separate related projects. The project lives in the NestJS and TypeScript ecosystem, and it is released under the MIT license.

read the full nodepress overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

next-js vs hexo react vs next-js react vs nuxt next-js vs vite next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll playwright vs storybook storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs docsify storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify supabase vs strapi hugo vs strapi hugo vs jekyll hugo vs payload hugo vs halo strapi vs ghost hugo vs filament strapi vs payload

More Blogging & Personal Sites projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Blogging & Personal Sites field.

hexo vs next.js hexo vs nuxt hexo vs gatsby hexo vs Ghost hexo vs jekyll hexo vs nextra hexo vs kit hexo vs vike hexo vs actions-gh-pages hexo vs react-snap hexo vs hugo-theme-academic-cv hexo vs docfx

Frequently asked questions

Is hexo or nodepress more popular?

hexo has 41,779 GitHub stars and nodepress has 1,525. hexo has the larger community by that measure.

Are hexo and nodepress free?

Both are open source. hexo is licensed under MIT and nodepress under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between hexo and nodepress?

hexo is written in TypeScript and nodepress in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, hexo or nodepress?

Choose hexo if you want the larger community (41,779 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose nodepress if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.