head to head · open source

nextra vs bludit

nextra has 13,925 GitHub stars, 1,416 forks, 346 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. bludit has 1,466 stars, 334 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. nextra leads on adoption by 850% (13,925 vs 1,466 stars). nextra is written in TypeScript under MIT; bludit is written in PHP under MIT. nextra has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, bludit 23%. bludit was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

nextra ★ 14K bludit ★ 1.5K category Content & Publishing

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

nextra bludit
GitHub stars ★ 14K ★ 1.5K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript PHP
Last push 2026-07-31 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 334
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick nextra if

  • You weight community size — 14K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full nextra profile →

pick bludit if

  • You want the bludit feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and bludit fits your workflow better

full bludit profile →

About nextra

Nextra is a simple, powerful and flexible site generation framework, built on Next.js and written in TypeScript, for developers and teams who want to author documentation or content sites in Markdown and MDX inside a React application.

read the full nextra overview →

About bludit

Bludit is flat file CMS. It runs in PHP web hosting ecosystem. It is categorized as Content & Publishing / Blogging & Personal Sites. It functions as blog engine, content management engine, and flat file engine. It is written in PHP and licensed under MIT.

read the full bludit overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

react vs next-js react vs nuxt next-js vs vite next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo playwright vs storybook storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs docsify storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify supabase vs strapi hugo vs strapi hugo vs jekyll hugo vs payload hugo vs halo strapi vs ghost hugo vs filament strapi vs payload

More Blogging & Personal Sites projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Blogging & Personal Sites field.

nextra vs next.js nextra vs nuxt nextra vs gatsby nextra vs Ghost nextra vs jekyll nextra vs hexo nextra vs kit nextra vs vike nextra vs actions-gh-pages nextra vs react-snap nextra vs hugo-theme-academic-cv nextra vs docfx

Frequently asked questions

Is nextra or bludit more popular?

nextra has 13,925 GitHub stars and bludit has 1,466. nextra has the larger community by that measure.

Are nextra and bludit free?

Both are open source. nextra is licensed under MIT and bludit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between nextra and bludit?

nextra is written in TypeScript and bludit in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, nextra or bludit?

Choose nextra if you want the larger community (13,925 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose bludit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.