head to head · open source

nanobot vs xiaozhi-android-client

nanobot has 49,806 GitHub stars, 8,711 forks, 775 open issues and last shipped yesterday. xiaozhi-android-client has 1,657 stars, 421 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. nanobot leads on adoption by 2,906% (49,806 vs 1,657 stars). nanobot is written in Python under MIT; xiaozhi-android-client is written in Dart under Apache-2.0. nanobot has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, xiaozhi-android-client 25%. nanobot was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (chatbot), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

nanobot ★ 50K xiaozhi-android-client ★ 1.7K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

nanobot xiaozhi-android-client
GitHub stars ★ 50K ★ 1.7K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python Dart
Last push 2026-11-04 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 8.7K ⑂ 421
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick nanobot if

  • You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full nanobot profile →

pick xiaozhi-android-client if

  • You want the xiaozhi-android-client feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You evaluated both and xiaozhi-android-client fits your workflow better

full xiaozhi-android-client profile →

About nanobot

English 简体中文 繁體中文 Español Français Bahasa Indonesia 日本語 한국어 Русский Tiếng Việt Discord · X · WeChat / Feishu nanobot 🐈 nanobot is an ultra lightweight, open source, self hosted personal AI agent framework written in Python. It runs in a WebUI, terminal, or chat apps and combines tools, long term memory, MCP integrations, model routing, multi agent delegation, scheduled automation, and an OpenAI compatible API in a small, readable core. Start Here What can nanobot do? nanobot is a self hosted personal AI agent runtime. It can: run in a browser WebUI or terminal connect to Telegram, Discord, Slack, WeChat, Email…

read the full nanobot overview →

About xiaozhi-android-client

中文 English Tiếng Việt 元旦更新 小智 AI 助手 · 全端客户端 Android · iOS · HarmonyOS · Web · Windows · macOS · Linux 基于小智AI的实时语音对话应用 · 支持实时语音交互与文字对话 🎉 新版本已发布,敬请体验! Flutter iOS 与 Android 回音消除已实现, 欢迎大家 PR 。 Dify 支持发送图片交互,可添加多个小智智能体到聊天列表。 觉得项目对您有用的,可以赞赏一下 —— 您的每一次赞赏都是我前进的动力。 📌 版本导览 可自行打包APK、IOS、WEB、PC、鸿蒙 HAP 版本 观看 demo 视频点击跳转 V1 原生客户端 · 纯血鸿蒙(支持3D模型) 观看视频点击跳转 当前项目包含两条产品线,定位不同,可按场景选择: 🟦 V1 原生客户端 · 纯血安卓 + 纯血鸿蒙(商业版赠送) 面向 AI 终端 / AI 硬件 / 智能体方向 ,包含两个原生版本: 纯血安卓版 、 纯血鸿蒙版 。购买商业版即可获赠。 💼 V3 商业版 · 全功能跨平台客户端 基于 Flutter,覆盖 Android、iOS、HarmonyOS、Web、Windows、macOS、Linux, 也适配鸿蒙,支持编译 HAP 包 。主打 全功能、全平台 ,深度适配自研服务端。 🟦 V1 原生客户端 · 纯血安卓 +…

read the full xiaozhi-android-client overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

Frequently asked questions

Is nanobot or xiaozhi-android-client more popular?

nanobot has 49,806 GitHub stars and xiaozhi-android-client has 1,657. nanobot has the larger community by that measure.

Are nanobot and xiaozhi-android-client free?

Both are open source. nanobot is licensed under MIT and xiaozhi-android-client under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between nanobot and xiaozhi-android-client?

nanobot is written in Python and xiaozhi-android-client in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, nanobot or xiaozhi-android-client?

Choose nanobot if you want the larger community (49,806 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose xiaozhi-android-client if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.