head to head · open source

nanobot vs invisible_dots

nanobot has 48,847 GitHub stars, 8,615 forks, 775 open issues and last shipped today. invisible_dots has 31,817 stars, 4,695 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped today. nanobot leads on adoption by 54% (48,847 vs 31,817 stars). nanobot is written in Python under MIT; invisible_dots is written in TypeScript under MIT. nanobot has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, invisible_dots 15%. nanobot was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agent, ai-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

nanobot ★ 49K invisible_dots ★ 32K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

nanobot invisible_dots
GitHub stars ★ 49K ★ 32K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-08 2026-10-08
Forks ⑂ 8.6K ⑂ 4.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick nanobot if

  • You weight community size — 49K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full nanobot profile →

pick invisible_dots if

  • You want the invisible_dots feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and invisible_dots fits your workflow better

full invisible_dots profile →

About nanobot

nanobot is an ultra lightweight, open source, self hosted personal AI agent framework written in Python, aimed at individual developers and small teams who want to run their own agent through a browser WebUI, a terminal, or chat apps instead of renting a hosted assistant.

read the full nanobot overview →

About invisible_dots

invisible dots is an open source, self hosted alternative to OpenAI Dots and Grok Bot that gives you your own AI agent running on a private, hardware virtualised computer with an anti detect browser.

read the full invisible_dots overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 392K Hermes Agent ★ 252K Ollama ★ 183K Dify ★ 158K ponytail ★ 158K Open WebUI ★ 154K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

nanobot vs OpenClaw nanobot vs Hermes Agent nanobot vs Open WebUI nanobot vs ComfyUI nanobot vs odysseus nanobot vs LobeChat nanobot vs AnythingLLM nanobot vs Cherry Studio nanobot vs LibreChat nanobot vs Jan nanobot vs chatbox nanobot vs openhuman

Frequently asked questions

Is nanobot or invisible_dots more popular?

nanobot has 48,847 GitHub stars and invisible_dots has 31,817. nanobot has the larger community by that measure.

Are nanobot and invisible_dots free?

Both are open source. nanobot is licensed under MIT and invisible_dots under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between nanobot and invisible_dots?

nanobot is written in Python and invisible_dots in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, nanobot or invisible_dots?

Choose nanobot if you want the larger community (48,847 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose invisible_dots if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.