head to head · open source

Metabase vs charts.css

Metabase has 49,323 GitHub stars, 6,824 forks, 4,346 open issues and last shipped today. charts.css has 6,584 stars, 178 forks, 36 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. Metabase leads on adoption by 649% (49,323 vs 6,584 stars). Metabase is written in Clojure under a custom or non-standard licence; charts.css is written in HTML under MIT. Metabase has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, charts.css 3%. Metabase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (data-visualization), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Metabase ★ 49K charts.css ★ 6.6K category Data & Analytics

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Metabase charts.css
GitHub stars ★ 49K ★ 6.6K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in Clojure HTML
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-04-04
Forks ⑂ 6.8K ⑂ 178
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Metabase if

  • You weight community size — 49K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Clojure
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Metabase profile →

pick charts.css if

  • You want the charts.css feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and charts.css fits your workflow better

full charts.css profile →

About Metabase

Metabase is an open source business intelligence and embedded analytics tool, written in Clojure, that lets everyone in a company ask questions of their data and build dashboards without needing to know SQL.

read the full Metabase overview →

About charts.css

Charts.css is an MIT licensed open source CSS framework that turns semantic HTML data tables into charts and graphs using nothing but CSS classes, aimed at frontend developers who want visualization without a JavaScript charting dependency.

read the full charts.css overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

mermaid vs metabase apache-superset vs metabase mermaid vs apache-superset mermaid vs echarts apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs pixijs mermaid vs diagram-design apache-superset vs pixijs crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider crawl4ai vs changedetection-io scrapling vs changedetection-io crawl4ai vs lux mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot apache-superset vs apache-pinot

More Business Intelligence & Reporting projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Business Intelligence & Reporting field.

Metabase vs Mermaid Metabase vs Apache Superset Metabase vs echarts Metabase vs pixijs Metabase vs diagram-design Metabase vs Redash Metabase vs dataease Metabase vs dash Metabase vs plotly.js Metabase vs deck.gl Metabase vs G6 Metabase vs sigma.js

Frequently asked questions

Is Metabase or charts.css more popular?

Metabase has 49,323 GitHub stars and charts.css has 6,584. Metabase has the larger community by that measure.

Are Metabase and charts.css free?

Both are open source. Metabase has no licence declared in this registry, and charts.css is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Metabase and charts.css?

Metabase is written in Clojure and charts.css in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Metabase or charts.css?

Choose Metabase if you want the larger community (49,323 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose charts.css if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.