head to head · open source

Metabase vs AVA

Metabase has 49,323 GitHub stars, 6,824 forks, 4,346 open issues and last shipped yesterday. AVA has 1,500 stars, 154 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Metabase leads on adoption by 3,188% (49,323 vs 1,500 stars). Metabase is written in Clojure under a custom or non-standard licence; AVA is written in TypeScript under MIT. Metabase has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, AVA 10%. Metabase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (data-visualization), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Metabase ★ 49K AVA ★ 1.5K category Data & Analytics

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

Metabase AVA
GitHub stars ★ 49K ★ 1.5K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in Clojure TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 6.8K ⑂ 154
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Metabase if

  • You weight community size — 49K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Clojure
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Metabase profile →

pick AVA if

  • You want the AVA feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and AVA fits your workflow better

full AVA profile →

About Metabase

Metabase is an open source business intelligence and embedded analytics tool, written in Clojure, that lets everyone in a company ask questions of their data and build dashboards without needing to know SQL.

read the full Metabase overview →

About AVA

AVA is an MIT licensed, TypeScript based AI native visual analytics framework for developers and agents that need to load unstructured data, ask questions in plain language, and generate chart output without building a rule based analytics pipeline.

read the full AVA overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

supabase vs metabase mermaid vs metabase godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs pixijs firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Business Intelligence & Reporting projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Business Intelligence & Reporting field.

Metabase vs Mermaid Metabase vs Apache Superset Metabase vs echarts Metabase vs pixijs Metabase vs diagram-design Metabase vs Redash Metabase vs dataease Metabase vs dash Metabase vs plotly.js Metabase vs deck.gl Metabase vs G6 Metabase vs sigma.js

Frequently asked questions

Is Metabase or AVA more popular?

Metabase has 49,323 GitHub stars and AVA has 1,500. Metabase has the larger community by that measure.

Are Metabase and AVA free?

Both are open source. Metabase has no licence declared in this registry, and AVA is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Metabase and AVA?

Metabase is written in Clojure and AVA in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Metabase or AVA?

Choose Metabase if you want the larger community (49,323 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose AVA if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.