head to head · open source

lynis vs SnapOtter

lynis has 16,355 GitHub stars, 1,635 forks, 224 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. SnapOtter has 2,685 stars, 136 forks, 208 open issues and last shipped yesterday. lynis leads on adoption by 509% (16,355 vs 2,685 stars). lynis is written in Shell under GPL-3.0; SnapOtter is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. lynis has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, SnapOtter 5%. SnapOtter was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (compliance), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

lynis ★ 16K SnapOtter ★ 2.7K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

lynis SnapOtter
GitHub stars ★ 16K ★ 2.7K
License GPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Shell TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 136
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick lynis if

  • You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full lynis profile →

pick SnapOtter if

  • You want the SnapOtter feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and SnapOtter fits your workflow better

full SnapOtter profile →

About lynis

Lynis is an agentless, GPL 3.0 security auditing and hardening tool that runs on the UNIX based system itself, built for system administrators, auditors, security officers, and penetration testers who need to assess security defenses and test compliance against standards such as ISO27001, PCI DSS, and HIPAA.

read the full lynis overview →

About SnapOtter

SnapOtter is an open source, self hosted file processing tool in TypeScript under AGPL 3.0. It provides a UI, REST API, and pipelines for conversion, compression, editing, OCR, transcription, metadata stripping, and local AI across images, video, audio, PDFs, and documents. It lives in the Docker based self hosted software ecosystem, where teams process media and documents on owned hardware instead of external services.

read the full SnapOtter overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

lighthouse vs lynis lighthouse vs teleport lighthouse vs prowler lighthouse vs gs-quant lighthouse vs opa lighthouse vs amphion lighthouse vs checkov lighthouse vs kyverno plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Compliance & Risk Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.

lynis vs lighthouse lynis vs teleport lynis vs prowler lynis vs gs-quant lynis vs opa lynis vs Amphion lynis vs checkov lynis vs kyverno lynis vs aircrack-ng lynis vs tfsec lynis vs rundeck lynis vs agent-governance-toolkit

Frequently asked questions

Is lynis or SnapOtter more popular?

lynis has 16,355 GitHub stars and SnapOtter has 2,685. lynis has the larger community by that measure.

Are lynis and SnapOtter free?

Both are open source. lynis is licensed under GPL-3.0 and SnapOtter under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between lynis and SnapOtter?

lynis is written in Shell and SnapOtter in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, lynis or SnapOtter?

Choose lynis if you want the larger community (16,355 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose SnapOtter if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.