head to head · open source

lux vs toapi

lux has 31,694 GitHub stars, 3,313 forks, 545 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. toapi has 3,555 stars, 241 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 24 days ago. lux leads on adoption by 792% (31,694 vs 3,555 stars). lux is written in Go under MIT; toapi is written in Python under MIT. lux has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, toapi 7%. toapi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (crawler), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

lux ★ 32K toapi ★ 3.6K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

lux toapi
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 3.6K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-03-29 2026-08-27
Forks ⑂ 3.3K ⑂ 241
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick lux if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full lux profile →

pick toapi if

  • You want the toapi feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and toapi fits your workflow better

full toapi profile →

About lux

Lux is a video download library and command line tool written in Go, released under the MIT license. It ships as a single lux binary that takes one or more URLs and retrieves the underlying media streams, and it also exposes the downloading logic as a Go library that other programs can embed. The project has existed for roughly nine years and lives in the Go ecosystem, distributed through go install alongside the usual operating system package managers.

read the full lux overview →

About toapi

toapi is a Python library that turns any web page into a JSON API by declaring the fields to extract with CSS selectors, aimed at developers who need structured data from sites that never published an API.

read the full toapi overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

lux vs Browser Use lux vs Crawl4AI lux vs Scrapling lux vs scrapy lux vs EasySpider lux vs Lightpanda lux vs changedetection.io lux vs CloakBrowser lux vs Scrapegraph-ai lux vs crawlee lux vs colly lux vs stagehand

Frequently asked questions

Is lux or toapi more popular?

lux has 31,694 GitHub stars and toapi has 3,555. lux has the larger community by that measure.

Are lux and toapi free?

Both are open source. lux is licensed under MIT and toapi under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between lux and toapi?

lux is written in Go and toapi in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, lux or toapi?

Choose lux if you want the larger community (31,694 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose toapi if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.