head to head · open source

lux vs puppeteer-sharp

lux has 31,694 GitHub stars, 3,313 forks, 545 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. puppeteer-sharp has 3,921 stars, 483 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. lux leads on adoption by 708% (31,694 vs 3,921 stars). lux is written in Go under MIT; puppeteer-sharp is written in C# under MIT. lux has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, puppeteer-sharp 12%. puppeteer-sharp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (crawler), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

lux ★ 32K puppeteer-sharp ★ 3.9K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

lux puppeteer-sharp
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 3.9K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go C#
Last push 2026-03-29 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 3.3K ⑂ 483
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick lux if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full lux profile →

pick puppeteer-sharp if

  • You want the puppeteer-sharp feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and puppeteer-sharp fits your workflow better

full puppeteer-sharp profile →

About lux

Lux is a video download library and command line tool written in Go, released under the MIT license. It ships as a single lux binary that takes one or more URLs and retrieves the underlying media streams, and it also exposes the downloading logic as a Go library that other programs can embed. The project has existed for roughly nine years and lives in the Go ecosystem, distributed through go install alongside the usual operating system package managers.

read the full lux overview →

About puppeteer-sharp

Puppeteer Sharp is an MIT licensed .NET port of the official Node.js Puppeteer API, giving C developers headless Chrome automation for screenshots, PDF generation, content extraction, and end to end testing without leaving the .NET toolchain.

read the full puppeteer-sharp overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

lux vs Browser Use lux vs Crawl4AI lux vs Scrapling lux vs scrapy lux vs EasySpider lux vs Lightpanda lux vs changedetection.io lux vs CloakBrowser lux vs Scrapegraph-ai lux vs crawlee lux vs colly lux vs stagehand

Frequently asked questions

Is lux or puppeteer-sharp more popular?

lux has 31,694 GitHub stars and puppeteer-sharp has 3,921. lux has the larger community by that measure.

Are lux and puppeteer-sharp free?

Both are open source. lux is licensed under MIT and puppeteer-sharp under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between lux and puppeteer-sharp?

lux is written in Go and puppeteer-sharp in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, lux or puppeteer-sharp?

Choose lux if you want the larger community (31,694 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose puppeteer-sharp if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.