head to head · open source

lux vs pdf_oxide

lux has 31,818 GitHub stars, 3,329 forks, 545 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. pdf_oxide has 1,156 stars, 147 forks, 322 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. lux leads on adoption by 2,652% (31,818 vs 1,156 stars). lux is written in Go under MIT; pdf_oxide is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. lux has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, pdf_oxide 13%. pdf_oxide was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

lux ★ 32K pdf_oxide ★ 1.2K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

lux pdf_oxide
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 1.2K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go Rust
Last push 2026-03-29 2026-10-31
Forks ⑂ 3.3K ⑂ 147
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick lux if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full lux profile →

pick pdf_oxide if

  • You want the pdf_oxide feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and pdf_oxide fits your workflow better

full pdf_oxide profile →

About lux

Lux Let there be Lux! 👾 Lux is a fast and simple video downloader built with Go. Installation Prerequisites Install via go install Homebrew (macOS only) Arch Linux Void Linux Scoop on Windows Chocolatey on Windows Cask on Windows/macOS/Linux Getting Started Download a video Download anything else Download playlist Multiple inputs Resume a download Auto retry Cookies Proxy Multi Thread Short link bilibili Use specified Referrer Specify the output path and name Debug Mode Reuse extracted data Options Download: Network: Playlist: Filesystem: Subtitle: Youku: aria2: Supported Sites Known issues 优酷 西瓜/头条视频…

read the full lux overview →

About pdf_oxide

PDFOxide The Fastest PDF Toolkit for 20 Languages — Python, Rust, Go, JS/TS, C , Java, Kotlin, Swift, C++ & more, plus CLI & AI New in v0.3.69 — eleven new language bindings. PDFOxide now ships idiomatic bindings for C++, Swift, Kotlin, Dart, R, Julia, Zig, Scala, Clojure, Objective C, and Elixir , each built over the stable C ABI with its own CI workflow, api coverage tests, and runnable examples. That brings the toolkit to 20 languages (Rust core + 19 bindings). Want another language? Open an issue and tell us. The fastest PDF library for text extraction, image extraction, and markdown conversion. A Rust core…

read the full pdf_oxide overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Related comparisons

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Frequently asked questions

Is lux or pdf_oxide more popular?

lux has 31,818 GitHub stars and pdf_oxide has 1,156. lux has the larger community by that measure.

Are lux and pdf_oxide free?

Both are open source. lux is licensed under MIT and pdf_oxide under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between lux and pdf_oxide?

lux is written in Go and pdf_oxide in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, lux or pdf_oxide?

Choose lux if you want the larger community (31,818 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose pdf_oxide if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.