head to head · open source
lux vs node-crawler
lux has 31,821 GitHub stars, 3,331 forks, 545 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. node-crawler has 6,796 stars, 862 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. lux leads on adoption by 368% (31,821 vs 6,796 stars). lux is written in Go under MIT; node-crawler is written in TypeScript under MIT. lux has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, node-crawler 13%. node-crawler was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (crawler), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| lux | node-crawler | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 6.8K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-03-29 | 2026-06-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.3K | ⑂ 862 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick lux if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick node-crawler if
- You want the node-crawler feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and node-crawler fits your workflow better
About lux
Lux Let there be Lux! 👾 Lux is a fast and simple video downloader built with Go. Installation Prerequisites Install via go install Homebrew (macOS only) Arch Linux Void Linux Scoop on Windows Chocolatey on Windows Cask on Windows/macOS/Linux Getting Started Download a video Download anything else Download playlist Multiple inputs Resume a download Auto retry Cookies Proxy Multi Thread Short link bilibili Use specified Referrer Specify the output path and name Debug Mode Reuse extracted data Options Download: Network: Playlist: Filesystem: Subtitle: Youku: aria2: Supported Sites Known issues 优酷 西瓜/头条视频…
About node-crawler
[![NPM download][download image]][download url] [![Package Quality][quality image]][quality url] [quality image]: [quality url]: [download image]: [download url]: Crawler v2 : Advanced and Typescript version of node crawler Features: Server side DOM & automatic jQuery insertion with Cheerio (default), Configurable pool size and retries, Control rate limit, Priority queue of requests, let crawler deal for you with charset detection and conversion, If you have prior experience with Crawler v1, for fast migration, please proceed to the section Differences and Breaking Changes. Use with AI agents This package ships…
read the full node-crawler overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is lux or node-crawler more popular?
lux has 31,821 GitHub stars and node-crawler has 6,796. lux has the larger community by that measure.
Are lux and node-crawler free?
Both are open source. lux is licensed under MIT and node-crawler under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between lux and node-crawler?
lux is written in Go and node-crawler in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, lux or node-crawler?
Choose lux if you want the larger community (31,821 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose node-crawler if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.