head to head · open source

lux vs invisible_selenium

lux has 31,755 GitHub stars, 3,323 forks, 545 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. invisible_selenium has 1,965 stars, 277 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped today. lux leads on adoption by 1,516% (31,755 vs 1,965 stars). lux is written in Go under MIT; invisible_selenium is written in Python under MIT. lux has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, invisible_selenium 14%. invisible_selenium was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

lux ★ 32K invisible_selenium ★ 2.0K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

lux invisible_selenium
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 2.0K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-03-29 2026-10-10
Forks ⑂ 3.3K ⑂ 277
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick lux if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full lux profile →

pick invisible_selenium if

  • You want the invisible_selenium feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and invisible_selenium fits your workflow better

full invisible_selenium profile →

About lux

Lux is a video download library and command line tool written in Go, released under the MIT license. It ships as a single lux binary that takes one or more URLs and retrieves the underlying media streams, and it also exposes the downloading logic as a Go library that other programs can embed. The project has existed for roughly nine years and lives in the Go ecosystem, distributed through go install alongside the usual operating system package managers.

read the full lux overview →

About invisible_selenium

invisible selenium is a Python package for web scrapers and browser automation engineers who want Selenium's existing API to run on an anti detect Firefox that anti bot systems do not flag as automated.

read the full invisible_selenium overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 117K Mermaid ★ 91K Scrapling ★ 87K Crawl4AI ★ 85K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

lux vs Browser Use lux vs Scrapling lux vs Crawl4AI lux vs scrapy lux vs EasySpider lux vs Lightpanda lux vs changedetection.io lux vs CloakBrowser lux vs dots lux vs Scrapegraph-ai lux vs page-agent lux vs ArchiveBox

Frequently asked questions

Is lux or invisible_selenium more popular?

lux has 31,755 GitHub stars and invisible_selenium has 1,965. lux has the larger community by that measure.

Are lux and invisible_selenium free?

Both are open source. lux is licensed under MIT and invisible_selenium under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between lux and invisible_selenium?

lux is written in Go and invisible_selenium in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, lux or invisible_selenium?

Choose lux if you want the larger community (31,755 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose invisible_selenium if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.