head to head · open source
lux vs camofox-browser
lux has 31,694 GitHub stars, 3,313 forks, 545 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. camofox-browser has 11,105 stars, 1,098 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped yesterday. lux leads on adoption by 185% (31,694 vs 11,105 stars). lux is written in Go under MIT; camofox-browser is written in JavaScript under MIT. lux has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, camofox-browser 10%. camofox-browser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| lux | camofox-browser | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 11K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-03-29 | 2026-09-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.3K | ⑂ 1.1K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick lux if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick camofox-browser if
- You want the camofox-browser feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and camofox-browser fits your workflow better
About lux
Lux is a video download library and command line tool written in Go, released under the MIT license. It ships as a single lux binary that takes one or more URLs and retrieves the underlying media streams, and it also exposes the downloading logic as a Go library that other programs can embed. The project has existed for roughly nine years and lives in the Go ecosystem, distributed through go install alongside the usual operating system package managers.
About camofox-browser
camofox browser is an anti detection browser server for AI agents, built in JavaScript and distributed under the MIT license. It wraps Camoufox, a Firefox fork that performs fingerprint spoofing at the C++ implementation level, and exposes that engine through a REST API designed for programmatic agents rather than human users. The project lives in the Node.js ecosystem and is published by the team behind jo, a personal AI agent. It is positioned as a drop in replacement for Puppeteer and Playwright when those tools are blocked.
read the full camofox-browser overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is lux or camofox-browser more popular?
lux has 31,694 GitHub stars and camofox-browser has 11,105. lux has the larger community by that measure.
Are lux and camofox-browser free?
Both are open source. lux is licensed under MIT and camofox-browser under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between lux and camofox-browser?
lux is written in Go and camofox-browser in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, lux or camofox-browser?
Choose lux if you want the larger community (31,694 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose camofox-browser if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.