head to head · open source

LobeChat vs screenpipe

LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars, 16,033 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. screenpipe has 22,209 stars, 2,263 forks, 36 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LobeChat leads on adoption by 277% (83,716 vs 22,209 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; screenpipe is written in Rust under a custom or non-standard licence. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, screenpipe 10%. screenpipe was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LobeChat ★ 84K screenpipe ★ 22K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

LobeChat screenpipe
GitHub stars ★ 84K ★ 22K
License Custom / other Custom / other
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 16K ⑂ 2.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LobeChat if

  • You weight community size — 84K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LobeChat profile →

pick screenpipe if

  • You want the screenpipe feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and screenpipe fits your workflow better

full screenpipe profile →

About LobeChat

[![][image banner]][vercel link] LobeHub LobeHub organizes your agents into 7×24 operation. It hires, schedules, reports on your entire AI team. You stay in charge — without staying online. English · 简体中文 · [Official Site][official site] · [Changelog][changelog] · [Documents][docs] · [Blog][blog] · [Feedback][github issues link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][docker release shield]][docker release link] [![][vercel shield]][vercel link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][codecov shield]][codecov link] [![][github action test shield]][github action test link] [![][github action…

read the full LobeChat overview →

About screenpipe

DOWNLOAD SCREENPIPE [ screenpipe YC S26 ] Screenpipe remembers how you actually work Record your screen continuously locally and provide context to your agents (Claude, Codex, Openclaw, Hermes, Runner...) what is this? screenpipe capture all your computer work locally and power your agents remember everything never forget what you saw, heard, or did run agents that work based on what you do generate agents, skills, and automations based on what you do search with ai find anything using natural language 100% local your data lives on your machine only source available inspect, modify, audit (LICENSE.md) company…

read the full screenpipe overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

Frequently asked questions

Is LobeChat or screenpipe more popular?

LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars and screenpipe has 22,209. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.

Are LobeChat and screenpipe free?

Neither LobeChat nor screenpipe declares a licence in this registry, so check each project's own repository before relying on either for a commercial use. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between LobeChat and screenpipe ?

LobeChat is written in TypeScript and screenpipe in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LobeChat or screenpipe ?

Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (83,716 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose screenpipe if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.