head to head · open source

LobeChat vs QwenPaw

LobeChat has 82,547 GitHub stars, 15,891 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. QwenPaw has 35,055 stars, 3,115 forks, 990 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LobeChat leads on adoption by 135% (82,547 vs 35,055 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; QwenPaw is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, QwenPaw 9%. LobeChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (agent, agent-harness), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LobeChat ★ 83K QwenPaw ★ 35K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

LobeChat QwenPaw
GitHub stars ★ 83K ★ 35K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 16K ⑂ 3.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LobeChat if

  • You weight community size — 83K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LobeChat profile →

pick QwenPaw if

  • You want the QwenPaw feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and QwenPaw fits your workflow better

full QwenPaw profile →

About LobeChat

LobeHub is an open source platform for managing, building, and operating AI agent teams. It functions as a Chief Agent Operator (CAO), enabling users to organize, schedule, and monitor autonomous AI agents around the clock. The project lives in the AI interaction and interfaces ecosystem, integrating with major LLM providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepSeek, and Alibaba’s GLM series.

read the full LobeChat overview →

About QwenPaw

QwenPaw is a personal AI assistant harness under the Apache 2.0 licence, aimed at people who want an LLM agent running on their own machine or in their own cloud account and reachable from the chat apps they already use.

read the full QwenPaw overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 246K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail langchain vs ponytail dify vs graphify langchain vs graphify ponytail vs graphify dify vs claude-mem dify vs ragflow

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

LobeChat vs OpenClaw LobeChat vs Hermes Agent LobeChat vs Open WebUI LobeChat vs AnythingLLM LobeChat vs Cherry Studio LobeChat vs nanobot LobeChat vs Jan LobeChat vs LibreChat LobeChat vs chatbox LobeChat vs AstrBot LobeChat vs openhuman LobeChat vs Langchain-Chatchat

Frequently asked questions

Is LobeChat or QwenPaw more popular?

LobeChat has 82,547 GitHub stars and QwenPaw has 35,055. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.

Are LobeChat and QwenPaw free?

Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and QwenPaw is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between LobeChat and QwenPaw?

LobeChat is written in TypeScript and QwenPaw in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LobeChat or QwenPaw?

Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (82,547 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose QwenPaw if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.