head to head · open source

LobeChat vs python-telegram-bot

LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars, 16,033 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. python-telegram-bot has 29,545 stars, 6,180 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. LobeChat leads on adoption by 183% (83,716 vs 29,545 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; python-telegram-bot is written in Python under GPL-3.0. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, python-telegram-bot 21%. LobeChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LobeChat ★ 84K python-telegram-bot ★ 30K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

LobeChat python-telegram-bot
GitHub stars ★ 84K ★ 30K
License Custom / other GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-01
Forks ⑂ 16K ⑂ 6.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LobeChat if

  • You weight community size — 84K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LobeChat profile →

pick python-telegram-bot if

  • You want the python-telegram-bot feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and python-telegram-bot fits your workflow better

full python-telegram-bot profile →

About LobeChat

[![][image banner]][vercel link] LobeHub LobeHub organizes your agents into 7×24 operation. It hires, schedules, reports on your entire AI team. You stay in charge — without staying online. English · 简体中文 · [Official Site][official site] · [Changelog][changelog] · [Documents][docs] · [Blog][blog] · [Feedback][github issues link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][docker release shield]][docker release link] [![][vercel shield]][vercel link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][codecov shield]][codecov link] [![][github action test shield]][github action test link] [![][github action…

read the full LobeChat overview →

About python-telegram-bot

.. image:: :align: center :target: :alt: python telegram bot Logo .. image:: :target: :alt: PyPi Package Version .. image:: :target: :alt: Supported Python versions .. image:: :target: :alt: Supported Bot API version .. image:: :target: :alt: PyPi Package Monthly Download .. image:: :target: :alt: Documentation Status .. image:: :target: :alt: LGPLv3 License .. image:: :target: :alt: Github Actions workflow .. image:: :target: :alt: Code coverage .. image:: :target: :alt: Median time to resolve an issue .. image:: :target: :alt: Code quality: Codacy .. image:: :target: :alt: Code Style: Black .. image:: :target…

read the full python-telegram-bot overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

Frequently asked questions

Is LobeChat or python-telegram-bot more popular?

LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars and python-telegram-bot has 29,545. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.

Are LobeChat and python-telegram-bot free?

Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and python-telegram-bot is licensed under GPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between LobeChat and python-telegram-bot?

LobeChat is written in TypeScript and python-telegram-bot in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LobeChat or python-telegram-bot?

Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (83,716 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose python-telegram-bot if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.